Answer:
Generally, advertisements made to the public in relation to the sale of a vehicle or any other merchandise at a specified price are not considered as offers for a binding contract by the courts. Instead, they are generally considered to be invitations to treat or for the public to make a deal. This implies that John's agreement to buy the Wagon R at the quoted price is an offer to Peter, which he is free to accept or reject.
The use of checks (cheques) is a valid means of exchange and is recognized by the courts in payment of the consideration in a contract.
Explanation:
The law of contract requires that there must be a mutual agreement (represented by an offer and acceptance), mutual assent (the legal intention to create a contract), and consideration (the price for the exchange). Since Peter and John did not move beyond the offer stage, there is no legally binding contract or agreement between them. Peter is free to reject John's offer to buy the Wagon R.
the order is b, a, c, e, f, g, d
Yes it is constitutional, the police searched his home without a warrant while he was not in the state on a suspicion that he had a meth lab in his home. They found a ghost AK-47 with bloody fingerprints in his home. That is illegal and a felony but because they searched his home with no warrant or a case being built to find that AK-47 the man had his rights to not be charged.
Answer:
I assume you want to know what computer-based crimes are against the law and have consequences.
Explanation:
Online Identity Theft, Obtaining information concerning a person, Obtaining information for free that costs the public a fee, Encrypting or decrypting data, etc. In certain states like Alaska these are considered as a Class C felony.
(P.S. FindLaw is a good website to help with subjects like this)
