Answer:
Explanation:
Few political systems have shown the adaptiveness and longevity of feudalism. This system, based on personal relationships, local administration, and defined hierarchies, touched several continents for more than 1,500 years. In some places it filled the void left by other political organizations; in others, it represented the next stage in the evolution of government. In both cases, feudalism grew out of practice and precedents. Theory followed experience. In all cases, a parallel code of values and aesthetics—chivalry in the West, bushido in the East—complemented and reinforced the system. Feudalism relied on personal and/or family honor as well as self–interest to work. Its informal and varied methods required a balance between superiors and dependents, rights and responsibilities. Though not in practice today, feudalism and the legends it inspired continue to fascinate many people.
Imperialism in India was very similar to imperialism in Africa. ... Like in Africa, the British that imperialized India were very forceful and treated the Indians like their servants. They believed they deserved to be in charge because they were more fit to lead.
this should help.... if you want more info heres a link
https://prezi.com/owht9mdvzfz7/european-imperialism-in-india-and-africa/
Answer:
Yes because they are racist
Explanation:
Cecilius Calvert, Lord Baltimore. Hope this helps.
Answer:
Loyalists desired security from the British, while Patriots desired indepdence from the mother country.
