Answer:
t was the first time people saw footage of combat in their homes, not only combat but more importantly the casualties resulting from it. Seeing American dead and wounded was a real shock, in prior wars such images were rarely released to the public.As reports from the field became increasingly accessible to citizens, public opinion began to turn against U.S. involvement, though many Americans continued to support it. Others felt betrayed by their government for not being truthful about the war. This led to an increase in public pressure to end the war.
Explanation:
The answer to tis is Soren Kierkegaard.
Siren Kierkegaard born in the year 1813 and died 1855. He was a Danish philosopher, theologian and psychologist. He is considered by some to be the father of existentialism both theistic and atheistic. He wrote that faith is not a decision based upon evidence because the level of evidence required is unavailable.
He argued that doubt is an element of faith and it is impossible to find any objective certainty about religious doctrines such as the existence of God.
Hope this helped :)
Have a great day
Answer:
It was accepted that political influence followed economic influence, and the railway was expected to extend Germany's economic influence towards the Caucasian frontier and to north Persia where Russia held a dominant position
Explanation:
The Weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation The Articles of Confederation is the first serious document of the U. S. , as it is the first U. S. Constitution.
<span>This document was first drafted and adopted in 1777 and then it was ratified in 1781. The Articles of Confederation set the rules for proper operations of the U. S. Confederation, which was capable of negotiating diplomatic agreements, making war, resolving administrative issues concerning the Western territories of the U. S. , and many other important issues. Yet, the Articles of Confederation were weak, because to a certain extent they expressed the new nation's fear of the authority and centralized power. </span>
<span>According to the Articles of Confederation there was no separation of powers, because under the Articles of Confederation was a unicameral legislature alone. According to the Articles, there was no executive or judicial branch, and, therefore, there was no coordinating authority and all the disputes were to be settled in the individual state courts. It was also difficult to pass the laws, as, under the Articles of Confederation, 2 / 3 ds super majority were required to pass a specific law, and unanimous consent of all states was required to make amendments. In addition, there was only one vote per state, irrespectively of the size of the state. Under the Articles of Confederation the central national government was too weak, because the major part of the power rested with the states. The Congress, therefore, was unable to tax or regulate and control commerce among the states.
This is a 250 word essay i did a few years back but its yours to use :)</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
It is true that some historians have argued that United States foreign policy has more often been motivated by economic interests than by the desire to spread democratic and humanitarian ideals around the world.
I mean, it is clear that the United States has many political and economic interests in different parts of the world. This was so notorious in tikes of the Cold Wolrd when it competed against the Soviet Union in the arms race, the space race, and the spread containment of Capitalism/Communism.
To what extent is this argument convincing with regard to United States foreign policy between 1890 and 1919?
Well, to the extent of the following evidence.
1.- President James Polk's ambition to apply Manifested Destiny. He offered money to México to get the territory of California and New Mexico. Mexico rejected the offer and the result was the Mexican-American War in which the US victory resulted in the annexation of the northern Mexican states.
2,. The Spanish-American War victory allowed the US to control the Philippines, Guam, and Puerto Rico.
3.- The James Monroe Doctrine and the Theodore Roosevelt Corollary.