On this day in 1789, George Washington becomes the first and only president to be unanimously elected by the Electoral College. He repeated this notable feat on the same day in 1792.
The peculiarities of early American voting procedure meant that although Washington won unanimous election, he still had a runner-up, John Adams, who served as vice president during both of Washington’s terms. Electors in what is now called the Electoral College named two choices for president. They each cast two ballots without noting a distinction between their choice for president and vice president. Washington was chosen by all of the electors and therefore is considered to have been unanimously elected. Of those also named on the electors’ ballots, Adams had the most votes and became vice president.
Although Washington’s overwhelming popularity prevented problems in 1789 and 1792, this procedure caused great difficulty in the elections of 1796 and 1800. In 1796, Federalist supporters of John Adams cast only one of their two votes in an effort to ensure that Adams would win the presidency without giving votes to any of the other candidates. This led to a situation in which the Federalist Adams won the highest number of votes and became president, but Thomas Jefferson, the opposing Democratic-Republican candidate, came in second and therefore became his opponent’s vice president.
In 1800, the system led to a tie between the Democratic-Republican candidates for president and vice president, Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr. This sent the vote to the House of Representatives, where Federalists voted for Burr instead of Jefferson, whom they despised. As a result, the Congressional vote ended in a tie 35 times before the Federalists decided to hand in blank ballots and concede the White House to Jefferson.
In 1804, the 12th Amendment to the Constitution ended this particular form of electoral chaos by stipulating that separate votes be cast for president and vice president.
Hope this helped!!!
The essay on the Why are there laws limiting the freedom of speech is written below.
<h3> Why are there laws limiting the freedom of speech?</h3>
The freedom of a person to express oneself is very important to man's ability to pass out their opinions, convictions, and also their beliefs, and to be able to be involved in democracy.
The Supreme Court was known to have stated some measures of restrictions on speech as a result or based on its content.
This is one that is seen in the area of if the government targets the speaker's message and thus violate the First Amendment.
Gehan, 2021, stated that the common justificatory approaches that is often used in a set of jurisdictions to frame the state’s burden was the need or the justification of the limitations on the freedom of expression via the use of the proportionality test.
Citation:
Gunatilleke, Gehan. (2021). Justifying Limitations on the Freedom of Expression. Human Rights Review. 22. 1-18. 10.1007/s12142-020-00608-8.
Learn more about freedom of speech from
brainly.com/question/243946
#SPJ1
During World War I, Germany had been blockaded, so they didn't have the fertilizer for their crops and the food to survive, which then led to deaths. After the war, Germany was just really inefficient, and they had major problems. These problems then led to Hitler becoming the tyrant of Germany, which then led to World War II because he blamed all of the problems on the Jewish people, which then made even more problems.
<u>The role the decision-making process plays in the activities of a political party:</u>
The political way to deal with basic leadership takes what the judicious and down to earth models forgot about and places that any authoritative action is a political and ideological action. The procedure of levelheaded basic leadership favors rationale, objectivity, and examination over subjectivity and understanding.
"Rational" in this setting doesn't mean normal or composed as it does in the conversational sense. By winning gathering assignments through essential races, extremists or change applicants can work inside the gatherings to access the general political decision voting form and in this manner improve their odds of general political decision triumphs without hosting to sort out third gatherings.
A few components which the model uses to the role the decision-making process are:
-
Encountering the circumstance.
-
Examining the circumstance.
- Time constraints.
-
Executing the choice.
-
Choice Quality
-
Subordinate responsibility.
