Answer:
passing new voting requirements.
Explanation:
At the end of the reconstruction in the United States, the african-americans were disenfranchised by the southern Democrats by certain laws, constitutions, and other practices that were intentionally put in place to stop the blacks from voting and also from registering to vote.
These laws were used to suppress the black voters. They made laws that did not seem racial on paper, just to avoid a violation of the fifteenth amendment. But they purposely implemented these laws to suppress the blacks.
The case must first be heard at the lowest level of court. Most states have a court system that exists in the same area as a federal magistrate court or federal district court. The case must be decided by the lower court and appealed to a higher court. In the federal system this is the circuit court. Once all the lower courts have been exhausted, the lawyers may apply to be heard by the <span>Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will determine which cases it will hear.
</span>
I believe the correct answer is the following one - <span>Yes, since the mistake would be obvious to a reasonable person.
Anyone presiding over this case would see that the store had nothing to do with this, and that it isn't really a huge crime as it was obviously just a mistake. So, the store wouldn't be held liable for a small mistake that one of its employees made.
</span>
Answer:
With an apology.
Explanation:
By saying sorry and issuing and apology.
