Answer:
We feel that the big data approach is applicable for all three of Gap Inc.’s brands, although the biggest insights from the information collected will come from the brand that has the greatest product diversity. Banana Republic is Gap’s most targeted brand with its expensive price points, so designers already have a relatively good idea of what their customers are looking for. The target customer is upscale, predominantly female, and interested in a classic look. The variability in design for the brand is least among Gap’s, but still significant so the ability to assess the success
of product offerings in real time is extremely valuable. Similar to the model used by Netflix, withonline shopping Gap does not have to rely on feedback from just the very few customers that choose to comment on and rate products that they purchase.With the introduction of “Product 3.0”, the trends seen at Banana Republic and the Gap were able to cascade down into the less expensive, family brand of Old Navy. This allowed for consumers of all income brackets to be touched. All brands had a clear vision with common ground, being more predictive and demand driven based on data analytics. This sharing of information benefits all of the brands by better streamlining products towards market trends. Since Old Navy and Gap have a greater number of SKU’s, they will have an even greater benefit from big data. But managing, purchasing and inventories for these companies is even more challenging, and having to deeply discount unsuccessful SKU’s can be unavoidable. But minimizing these unsuccessful products can be achieved through big data by analyzing how well a product performs before waiting to receive customer feedback. Gap can emulate fast fashion companies like Zara who keep production runs short, even shorter for unsuccessful runs, and create a sense of urgency from the customer without complicating the customer’s decision process with an inevitable sale
Explanation:
A country would have a comparative advantage to produce a good if the cost of producing this good, even if it produces efficiently, is higher than that of other countries.
Explanation:
The Competitive Vantage Principle explains how an individual produces more commodities and uses fewer goods with a comparative advantage under freer trade.
For example, the comparative advantage of oil-producing countries in chemical products. Compared to countries that are not there, the local manufactured oil is a cheap source of chemicals.
It can produce products with fewer resources, which offers countries a comparative advantage at lower incentive costs. The PPF's gradient reflects the cost of output capacity. Improving one good's production means producing less of one.
Answer: $1,986.14
Explanation: in order to calculate this, we will use the discounting formula and calculate the present value (PV) of the money.
PV = C/(1 + r)^n
Where:
PV = Present Value = ?
C = value of money in the future = $8,600
r = interest rate = 9% or 0.09
n = number of years = 17
PV = 8,600/(1 + 0.09)^17
PV = 8,600/(1.09)^17
PV = 8,600/4.33
PV = 1,986.14
Therefore the present value is $1,986.14
Answer:
6.88%
Explanation:
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) = [After Tax Cost of Debt * Weight of Debt] + [Cost of equity * Weight of Equity]
WACC = [3.40%*0.39] + [10.80%*0.69)
WACC = [0.034*0.39] + [0.108*0.69)
WACC = 0.01326 + 0.07452
WACC = 0.08778
WACC = 8.78%
The required return for the new project = Weighted Average Cost of Capital – Risk Adjustment Factor
The required return for the new project = 8.78% - 1.90%
The required return for the new project = 6.88%
Answer:
Hnters
Explanation:
Hunter's Hut is considering a project that will require additional inventory of $150,000 and will increase accounts payable by $125,000. Accounts receivable is currently $300,000 and is expected to increase by 10 percent if this project is accepted. What is the project's initial cash flow for net working capital
