Answer:
No
Explanation:
Although the Fiscal policy includes the detail of government revenue collection and its spending and military budget is allocated in the budget as part of the policy, however after the incident of 9/11, the increase in military spending (including spending on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan) was designed to achieve homeland security objectives.
White House designated the Office of Homeland Security to oversee and coordinate a comprehensive national strategy to safeguard the country against terrorism and respond to any future attacks.
Answer:
my baby daddy.
Explanation:
I forgot to take the pill :(
The principal duhhh dumb add jhit
Answer:
$220,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine How much income from self-employment did Samuel earn from STU
Using this formula
Income from self-employment =Guaranteed payment received+(Interest rate*Ordinary income)
Let plug in the formula
Income from self-employment=$120,000+(25%*$400,000)
Income from self-employment=$120,000+$100,000
Income from self-employment=$220,000
Therefore the amount of income from self-employment that Samuel earn from STU is $220,000
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
