They feared that more populous states would have a sort of monopoly on elections and that it was best for all states to have the exact same powers as other, smaller states.
Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.
Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.
Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal, regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.
Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract, out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.
In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.
Answer;
To break a tie vote on a bill
The president of the Senate is allowed to vote on legislative matters in order to break a tie vote on a bill.
Explanation;
Under Article I, section 3 of the constitution, The vice president of the United states shall be the president of the state, but shall have no vote; unless they be equally divided.
The president of the senate presides over the senate only on ceremonial occasions or when a tie-breaking vote may be needed.
Concurrent power are those powers practiced and executed at the same time, in a common area and within the same group of people by the State and Federal government in a jointly manner. Also, concurrent powers deal with political powers that are used by the state and at the same time, by Federal governments.
Concurrent powers are very useful for the different levels of Government because they allow them to maintain people´s safety, stop criminal acts, improve the economy and at the same time, to punish and stop criminal actions.
The correct answer will be an example of concurrent power is when a federal law enforcement agency helps a state police. This is a classical example of both agencies acting together for the common good of their citizens.
The president can turn down proposed laws
