(Paragraph 1) Should eyewitness testimony be allowed in the courtroom? No but at the same time yes. There are many reasons why they should but shouldn't. It is a risk to their safety, some eyewitnesses are not liable, they could be paid off but at the same time their testimony could help win a case. (Paragraph 2) Depending on a crime, the eyewitness safety could be in danger. If the case was against a member of a gang or mafia. They could send someone after that witness. This is reason why we have the Witness Protection Program. If they testify they put their lives at risk. (Paragraph 3) Having a witness is a key thing to have. If you have a witness you are the one who most likely the one to win the case. In some cases you could have problems with the witness not being liable, getting paid off to not say anything or to lie. Or in most cases if they are confused they will not have them testify. Or they aren't straight on the details and keep changing the story that usually means they are lying on what they saw.
Note: This is a summary. Add more and edit it to make it sound like something you would type.
The Y in APY means yearly, the answer is APY
Answer: D
Explanation:
Use the Mutlilevel List Icon
You have to avoid calling potential clients unless they initiate contact with you and specifically request that you give them a call.
<h3>What is a health care plan?</h3>
A health care plan refers to a medical plan for the medical care of a particular patient which covers a part or whole risk of the medical expenses incurred such as Medicare.
In this scenario, we can reasonably infer that as a marketer, you should avoid calling potential clients to market those medical plans, unless they initiate contact with you and specifically request that you give them a call.
Read more on Medicare here: brainly.com/question/14166257
#SPJ1
Stephen should be more concerned with the shareholder management theory and Karishma should be more concerned with the stakeholder management theory.
The following information should be considered:
For shareholder:
- It is the owners of the company,
- It could be equity or preference shareholder.
- It should be considered when they are limited by shares.
For stakeholder:
- They are not the owners but have an interest in the company.
- Each company contains the stakeholder.
- It includes the creditors, government, etc.
- It should be considered for the performance of the company.
Therefore we can conclude that Stephen should be more concerned with the shareholder management theory and Karishma should be more concerned with the stakeholder management theory.
Learn more about the management here: brainly.com/question/14874943
