Answer:
This is a difficult question to explain, and here is my opinion, they shouldn't.
Explanation:
Not allowing mobs to influence government actions, depends on how you define mobs. If they are peaceful protests, then they should be allowed to influence government action, for example, the civil rights movement.
A violent mob would be seen as a rebellion, at a certain extent, and shouldn't be allowed to influence government policies and decisions.
Transcript of 1920's v 1950'sCurious as to how the 1920's and
1950's compare in America? Let's take a look and see. First let's start with the commonalities They both started after the end of World Wars The 1920's began after WWI The 1950's began after WWII They were both decades of Economic
Prosperity for the wealthy and Upper
Middle Class Consumer Goods Increased Exponentially Higher Wages Than Ever Before and Less Hours Media Focus on
Advertisements and Entertainment Suburban Shopping Centers Films and Sports flourish Teenage
Rebellions Urban and Suburban Life
Answer:
it is basically an opinion answer. there is no wrong answer per se but Lincoln's plan was more moderate. His biggest desire was to re-unite the country, not to punish them. they probably would have been more ok with what the Radical Republicans wanted which was to punish the South.
The Egyptian hieroglyphic<span> script was one of the writing systems used by ancient Egyptians to represent their language
papyrus was a plant like tall grass and was used like paper, to write down important messages or other things.</span>
As more and more modern things were being implemented into society people found a need for change. A change to modern times. Some modern activites which cause this such as trade and wealth were becoming more popular therefore causing more modern adjustment which caused the Renaissance.
