<span>King James tried to change the order of succession to make his son, also James, the next king instead of an older daughter. As James and his son were both Catholics, this was unacceptable to the elected representatives. King James tried to make a Catholic dynasty and the predominantly Protestant Parliament were having none of it. They facilitated William of Orange, a protestant, in overthrowing James.
James being overthrown was the beginning of modern democracy. The Parliament and democracy won.</span>
Answer:
it is he is walking out of the store
Explanation:
Bystander Intervention is recognizing a potentially harmful situation or interaction and choosing to respond in a way that could positively influence the outcome.
1. You hear someone screaming for help. It illustrates your assumption of responsibility to intervene as a bystander.
In order to act a bystander must satisfy five stages.
1. Identifying the event as a problem condition.
2. Interpreting the even as an emergency
3. Assuming responsibility to act.
4. Know what should be done in a situation.
5. Decide to help the victim.
The first option is incorrect because the bystander has failed to recognize it as a problem.
The second option is incorrect because the bystander has not decided to offer help.
The third option is incorrect because the bystander has no idea what to do in the situation.
The fourth option is correct because the bystander has satisfied all the above five steps. and he has called the authorities.
Learn more about Bystander Intervention here
brainly.com/question/3520355
#SPJ4
Hello there!
President Andrew Jackson, nicknamed "Indian killer" or "sharp knife", was one of our "most racist" presidents. He killed many Indians, and disliked anyone apart from his race; white.
<span>President Andrew Jackson said that “this is a country for white men”, meaning he obviously disliked anyone of color.
Hope this helps you!
~DL
</span>
Answer:
A change in the meaning of an unambiguous provision in the contract
Explanation:
The main aim of the pleading the parol evidence rule is to ensure that a party is prevented from any introduction of evidence of oral agreements made before the contract was agreed or in the process of reducing the agreement to its final form for the purpose of altering the existing terms in the current contract. Hence Weaver pleading the parol evidence rule ensures that Ward does not introduce parol evidence as long as it relates to a change in any of the provisions in the contract.
