1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vodomira [7]
3 years ago
6

Una vez conocida la definición de ética y ciencia. Contesta en plenaria lo siguiente y por qué decides una cosa o la otra .

Social Studies
1 answer:
Nady [450]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Elige a la mujer porque

Explanation:

 Si salvas al bebé, el niño crecerá sin madre. Si salvas a la madre, puede que le tome un poco recuperarse, pero puede volver al campo e intentarlo de nuevo. Esos son solo mis pensamientos

You might be interested in
How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs
kenny6666 [7]

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


7 0
3 years ago
Abraham has been working hard to reach his full potential, both in his relationship with his family and at work. He wants to bec
kramer

Answer:

Option B.

Explanation:

Self-actualization, is the right answer.

According to Maslow's hierarchy, the given statement is the case of Self-actualization. He uses this term to describe in the context of an individual who is living creatively and thoroughly exercising his or her potentials. It is referred to as the desire for self-fulfillment, specifically, to the trend for him to grow realized in what he is potential.

4 0
3 years ago
In the past, a teacher has reinforced children for working quietly and independently after she announces "Pooh Bear Time to Hibe
Tcecarenko [31]

The correct answer is Conditioned Stimuls

In classical conditioning, the conditioned response is the learned response to the previously neutral stimulus. For example, suppose that the smell of food is an unconditioned stimulus, the feeling of hunger in response to the smell is an unconditioned response, and a whistle is the conditioned stimulus.

4 0
3 years ago
Kathy enjoys a diet cherry vanilla Dr. Pepper after her workout each day. After about four weeks of this routine, she grows tire
umka21 [38]
The answer is true because Kathy is moving from one brand of soft drink to another brand
5 0
3 years ago
During the Constitutional Convention, Gouverneur Morris argued strongly against a model of the executive branch where most of th
Wittaler [7]

Answer:

The correct naswer is Property owners.

Explanation:

Gouvernor Morris believed that common people were uncapable of self-government because of the economic status of many of the voters will end up on the poor folk selling their vote to the rich and he stated that because of this Voting should be restricted to property owners.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • B. F. Skinner would argue that ""getting a paycheck on Friday"" reinforces a person for coming to work on Friday but would not r
    7·1 answer
  • URGENT
    12·2 answers
  • Live and executive branches.
    15·2 answers
  • Major elements in a payroll system are a.a payroll register. b.employees' earnings records. c.payroll checks. d.All of these cho
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT part of the agricultural revolution at the end of the 19th century?
    15·1 answer
  • The mosque and minaret are mostly closely associated with which Pillar of Islam?
    10·1 answer
  • According to Jody freeman what are some of the reasons why Fed’s should intervene with national standards
    6·1 answer
  • 3. the Customary marriage requires the consent of​
    7·1 answer
  • Make everyday a Mandela Day​
    15·2 answers
  • Why is foreign aid being given to stable countries
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!