<span>Upon hearing Juliette’s death, Romeo is determined to go to
the vault where she was laid to rest. He
informs Balthasar that he will go see Juliette but he has other plans in
mind. He also reveals that to Balthasar
that if he will kill him if he prevents him from seeing her. When confronted by his determination remains
strong and he will kill Paris even when he doesn’t want to. He kills Paris in the end. He is firm in his steadfastness to be with
Juliette to the point that he is willing to die. Fate and fortune are the main concepts of his
actions.</span>
Answer:
All of those
Explanation:
All of those have to deal with ones own thoughts and opinions
Answer: 1. "It was idle, he knew, to get between a fool and his folly" means that it was useless and unimportant to make a fool understand something. 2. The fool is Hal. 3. His folly was his lack of good sense, trying to wake the dogs up. 4. John Thornton thought it was non-sense to intervene because regardless of the past warnings of the ice breaking down, he still wanted to wake the dogs up and continue moving.
Explanation: In the story, the team that is traveling towards their destination encounters difficulties to cross the river. John Thornton warns them that the ice is melting and that they might sink If they continue. Despite all the tragedies and losses the team has had in the trip, Hal ignores the warnings and tries to wake the dogs up. Thornton concludes that trying to convince a fool and his lack of non-sense is useless and unimportant since there is no way Hal will understand.
Metaphor/D
a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.
Religious toleration is people allowing other people to think or practice other religions and beliefs.
When someone says they’re a theist and believe in something that you may think is absurd or crazy, you take them seriously anyway.
When someone says that they have to observe the Sabbath and will be unavailable, you take them seriously.
When someone politely apologizes that they can’t do something because it’s against their religious beliefs, with no harm to the other person, you accept their apology, realize they don’t mean to hurt you, and move on. (I’m excluding the case where this is being done because of discrimination or nefariousness).
When someone asks to eat in a restaurant that accords with their religion’s dietary laws, and this doesn’t negatively affect you, you go there instead of a different restaurant.
