1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ugo [173]
2 years ago
12

Please help me this is and an exam and i am currently failing world history...

History
1 answer:
Nitella [24]2 years ago
5 0

Two problems that led to the dissolution of the League of Nations were:

  • Its inaction when some of its members engaged in aggressive actions.
  • The fact that some powerful nations were not members.

<h3>Why was the League of Nations dissolved?</h3>

The League of nations failed to properly act when Italy and Japan attacked Ethiopia and China even though all four countries were in the League. This led to a loss of confidence.

Two powerful nations were also not members which were Russia and the U.S. which made it hard to enforce policies.

Find out more on the League of Nations at brainly.com/question/14108935.

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
People of German ancestry are the largest European ethnic group in Texas today true or false
nordsb [41]
True if its wrong i'm sorry.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Same as before first to answer correctly will get the brainliest
lukranit [14]
<span>C. They influenced chavez to use nonviolent methods such as a hunger strike</span>
6 0
3 years ago
What was a key difference between East and West Germany?
Nutka1998 [239]
4. East Germany was communist, while West Germany was democratic.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
a president has signed an arms control treaty approved by the Senate, but 20 years later, a different president thinks the terms
Zina [86]

Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution declares that the president "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur." But it doesn't say anything about the power to break treaties.

7 0
3 years ago
NEED TO BE ANSWERED ASAP!!! WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST IF IT IS ANSWERED CORRECTLY
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

    The bombing of Hiroshima is and Nagaski is one of the most important events in history. Due to the fact that this affected and still is affecting human kind in Hiroshima and Nagaski. This all occurred because of Hiroshimas military and to the intend to make Japan surrender, in cause to end World War ll, they later decided to bomb Nagaski too. Over 200,000 died and thousands more were hurt in this tragity, but some surviors live to tell the story of this historic moment. Two of those surviors were Sunao Tsuboi and Shigemitsu Tanaka,  victims of the Hiroshima and Nagaski bombing on August 6, 1945 and August 9, of 1945.

   While Sunao Tsuboi was a 20 year old man heading to collage in Hiroshima  when this occurred, he was buned from head to toe he stated in NYTimes.com. He knew at this moment it would be the end for him, he layed next to a bridge. Until a classmate found and  approched him, he took him to a military hsopital where he got medical help. Till this day he is a retired worker, with a wife, children, and grandchildern. He has worked in office for the President and urged and stated this to the president to "work for world peace after he leave office".

  Shigemitsu Tanaka, was almost five when he witness this tragity. He discribed everything as white, windows braking, and a huge thunderclap in the sky. He was only playing under a tree when he took cover and tried to protect  himself. Later his mother suffered from repeated illnesses she worked as an elementary instructor. His father later died from cancer after 12 years of the bombing. Tanka said he "smelled burning flesh and moans", he also stated that Obama should clear nuclear wepons for good and hoped he would sit and listen to survivors.

   I would not defend nor support this tragity due to the fact that many innocent people were hurt or killed. In my opionion I think the United States should have used a diffrerent strategy to the point where no human being should have been hurt. Sometimes I do not understand why the United States didn't take percuation in this situation for the people. They always use the moto "For the good of the people" but did not lead up to this at the end. So in conculsion I DO NOT support or defend the bombing of Hiroshima or Nagaski.  

WRBSITES:https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.html

Hope this somewhat helps you out, make sure to check for spelling errors many typos.

websites: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.htmlExplanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following makes a true statement about the relationship between goverment and finacial institutions?
    5·1 answer
  • What does the declaration say about the rights of people and the role of the government?
    14·1 answer
  • Do you think the elastic clause is a necessary clause for the running of the US Government?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following words describes a candidate that comes off well in the media, particularly on television?
    7·1 answer
  • 3. How did Manifest Destiny Harm Native Americans
    9·1 answer
  • The Sepoy Rebellion was to India as the Boxer Rebellion was to
    14·1 answer
  • During the Hoover administration, several economic warning signs appeared. Can you name them?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the significance of the louisiana purchase lp?
    12·1 answer
  • PART A: Why does Elie Wiesel believe indifference is the most dangerous emotion? A because it creates prejudice and hatred B bec
    9·2 answers
  • Someone please help!!! i’ll mark you brainliest.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!