1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elena-2011 [213]
4 years ago
14

Is it preferable for the U.S. government to have unified party control or divided government? Why?

History
1 answer:
mixas84 [53]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

It is preferable for the U.S. government to have a unified party control in order to avoid conflict. There should be diversity in the way individual members think, yes, but a divided government has a higher probability of causing big group disputes and those never lead anywhere good. With one unified party, members will have similar beliefs and goals for the country, which will allow for a better, more efficient government and running of the country.

You might be interested in
Recognizing the commoutons or warrematicians
castortr0y [4]

Answer:

2233

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You should do it for free and help a homi<br> out
Kitty [74]

Answer:

do what for free? well you should help everyone for free

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what information in the graph supports this statenent from the text. "New technology had a heavier impact on the north than on t
swat32
Honestly the graph doesn't show anything about technology. the only thing i could think of was something close to technology is factories. the north will have more impact on technology  than the south that's only cause north makes more money than the south does to have technology. i hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
After reviewing the “Courting Letters” of Emily and Harry--how was “courting” done in 1859?
Anit [1.1K]

Answer:

Did u find the answer, please If you find can you tell me

5 0
3 years ago
How did sir Robert Clive increase The power of the British in India
Alexxandr [17]

Answer: Robert Clive was not a very nice man. He was a British colonel who while working for the British East India Company, took back the city of Calcutta which had been lost after the BEIC had lost it, and then bribed  Mir Jafar, who was a military general who was later appointed Nawab of Bengal, to help get Bengal from Siraj. Clive really established the military and political supremacy of the East Idia company in Bengal-while making himself rich in the process.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need help!!!! <br> what did the opium war and the boxer rebellion have in common
    15·1 answer
  • Where is dragon army ranked after their battle with rabbit army?
    9·1 answer
  • describe the rise of the ottoman turks, the conquest of Constantinople in 1453 and the subsequent growth of the ottoman empire u
    11·1 answer
  • Do you think the United States would have risked losing World War I had it not passed the Espionage and Sedition Acts and taken
    14·1 answer
  • "The threats we face today as Americans respect no nation's borders. Think of them: terrorism, the spread of weapons of mass des
    5·1 answer
  • Why did geography have such a strong impact on the lives of hunter-gatherers in the
    9·2 answers
  • 3.1 Which of the following individuals most strongly influenced the ideas in the excerpt of the Declaration of the Rights of Man
    11·1 answer
  • Anza traveled to California
    12·2 answers
  • Focus Questions: What Is Insurrection?
    10·1 answer
  • During the election of 1844 polk said he.
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!