1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
earnstyle [38]
1 year ago
13

Part A

English
2 answers:
Svetradugi [14.3K]1 year ago
6 0
D, I did this when a bit younger and I remember it.
nignag [31]1 year ago
4 0
A) d
B) b
Sorry if I am wrong btw I didn’t read the story so I am choosing the best answer from what I have :)
You might be interested in
Which sentence below shows correct use of em dashes? If the cat meows one more time I know – he will – I am going to have to get
elena55 [62]
<span>"If the cat-meows one more time, I know, he will – I am going to have to get the treats."

This is the sentence that provides the proper use of dashes. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write an argumentative essay in which you argue whether or not statutes of limitations are fair for both plaintiffs and defendan
laiz [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

The idea behind statutes of limitations is mainly one of general practicability and fairness. The offending party in any legal dispute knows that he or she committed or may be accused of committing some wrong against the other party. In such a case, the wronged party must decide whether to bring a lawsuit in order to recover for his or her wrong. The law will not tolerate a plaintiff who procrastinates, a plaintiff who delays for effect, or one who is negligent or forgetful. After a period of time has passed, the chance to sue disappears.

State Civil Statute of Limitations

Every state enforces strict time limits for filing a civil action, whether it's a medical malpractice lawsuit or a claim for collection of debt. Again, they are intended to ensure the integrity of physical evidence and witness testimony, while also removing the indefinite threat of a lawsuit (which could be used as blackmail in the absence of limits). For instance, the time limit to file a trespass case in California is three years from the date of the incident, whereas in Colorado it is only two years.

How Long?

The lengths of time for statutes of limitation correspond roughly to the amount of notice that both parties have regarding the underlying injury or wrong. The more notice both parties have that there is a problem and the more likely it is that the injured party will sue, the longer the statute of limitation. The less likely it is that the offending party will be aware of his wrong or the more inconsequential it is likely to be, the shorter the statute of limitation.

The longest statutes of limitation are generally those regarding the recovery of judgments after a lawsuit. In this situation, the parties are clearly on notice of the lawsuit. If the losing party refuses to pay his judgment, it should come as no surprise that he will be sued, even if it is as many as 10 years later.

On the other hand, if one person is physically injured by another person but does not sue within a year or two, it is reasonable to expect that the plaintiff either forgot about the injury or it was not as serious as originally suspected. In this case, the potential defendant is protected from a lawsuit that he may not even be aware is pending, especially more than a year or two after the accident that caused the injury occurred.

4 0
3 years ago
Read the sentence. When will Lena tell ''him'' the truth? What kind of complement is indicated by the bolded word? predicate nom
Artist 52 [7]
"Him" is the indirect object.

"Lena" is the subject, the person performing the action. "Tell" is the verb, the action performed. "The truth" is the direct object, the recipient of the action. "Him" is affected by the action.

Hope this helps! :)
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
K12
Verdich [7]

Answer:

Space exploration will lead to increased conflict among nations and should be discouraged.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

Explanation:

Money plays a pivotal role in today's social and family life and it has a relationship with the way a child grows up and prepares to meet the challenges in the future. Usually, rich families compensate better life for the children. However, some people argue that children who are brought up in middle-class families are often better prepared for their future than those who are brought up in wealthier families. I personally believe that children from wealthier families get better opportunities and they learn far more to be prepared for the future challenges.

 

On the one hand, it is said that families with less money prepare their children for a better future. It is true that those children learn the key elements of life in their childhood; such as the real value of money as well as how hard is it to earn, the importance of family tie and so on. Often, those children learn to save money for their future use. Therefore they automatically prepare for setting a target in life and make plans for pursuing them. Therefore many significant qualities of life which are learned by these children from such a family in their earlier stages in life.

On the other hand, children from wealthier families are little behind in terms of learning many important things in childhood when compared with the mindset of poor children. However, they have all the facilities which they need for their education and future. For instance, they are well equipped with all the necessary requirement to start a business or join a job without a hassle. Furthermore, those families build the foundation for their children to begin their life perfectly. The education, teaching and facilities those rich children get are far better than the education and teaching of the poor children. Moreover, those rich children eventually learn the most important aspects of life, may be little latter than the poor children, but they have far greater facilities that ultimately give them advantages in life.

 

To conclude, money and education build a better future life. Because of that, wealthier children have much better and flexible life than poor children. Therefore, I believe children from wealthy families get a competitive advantage than the children from poor families in terms of education and preparation for the future.

{written by  Romesh Rodrigo}

Please mark as brainliest

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the role of paradox in this passage?
    9·2 answers
  • How is the denotation of a word different from its connotation?
    11·2 answers
  • What elements of the Restoration comedy are seen in The Importance of Being Earnest? Please explain in 3-5 sentences. Thanks!
    14·1 answer
  • What was the author's main purpose for writing " Learning Guitar"
    13·2 answers
  • Clear examples of pollution’s negative consequences would best serve the purpose of?
    13·2 answers
  • Where do I put the commas in the sentence “My friend Gideon can balance a stack of books on her head”
    10·2 answers
  • *due in an hour help asap please thanks ily* How do we know that a sacred swamp is supposed to make us think of the Garden of Ed
    5·1 answer
  • Name two changes that the speaker describes happening to the father in “Full Fathom Five.
    8·2 answers
  • Which evidence effectively supports the position and reason that follow? Check all that apply. Position: Every community has its
    7·1 answer
  • Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!