1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
asambeis [7]
1 year ago
12

Scene 4:

English
1 answer:
IRINA_888 [86]1 year ago
8 0

The reason I think the playwrights made the switch from answering the phone to a separate dialogue between Anne and Peter is to show their closeness with each other.

<h3>What is a Dialogue?</h3>

This refers to the interaction and conversation that occurs between two or more people in a story and where feedback is given.

Hence, we can see that the analysis of Mr. Frank's line is that he now has renewed belief that things have become better, and their days of hiding and fear are over.

You did not include the last line of the play, but dramatic irony occurs when an audience is aware of what will happen next, but the characters are not aware.

Read more about Anne and Frank here:

brainly.com/question/16787697

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Write the contraction for: are not
valina [46]

Answer:

Aren't

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Quindlen begins by disagreeing with a fellow writer. How and how fairly does she represent the opposing point of view?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:Quindlen was criticizing the application of standardized testing (perhaps in the wake of the controversial "No Child Left Behind" act which some say placed too much emphasis on standardized testing). Quindlen's argument is that if standardized testing is to be used, it should at least be interesting and more importantly, such testing should not edit works of literature to the point at which significant meaning is lost. Actually, she is arguing that literature should not be edited at all.  

Quindlen doesn't think children are too feeble and weak to read controversial issues because they are exposed to such issues through the media and Internet every day. In fact, by sanitizing (editing out anything remotely controversial) literature, the test will not challenge the student.  

Those who design the test claim that anything controversial might distract the student and affect his/her performance. Quindlen's response is that the kids can handle it and more to the point, if all remotely controversial issues are edited out, what is left can hardly been interesting or engaging. Also, to edit in this way is historically irresponsible. Quindlen notes that in Isaac Singer's excerpt about being a young Jew in prewar (World War II) Poland, all references to Jews and Poles were taken out.  

Quindlen notes that there are other consequences of this editing. One is that the students will determine from this that those designing the test have no faith in their (the students') ability to handle differing perspectives and challenging intellectual material. Quindlen argues that this is sending the message to children that "we don't think you're smart enough."  

But what do the kids learn from this? That the written word doesn't really matter much, that it can be weakened at will. That no one trusts a student to understand that variations in opinion and background are both objectively interesting and intellectually challenging.  

This also tells the student that there is no power to the written word (as literature, laws, etc.) if we can simply edit things that don't appeal to a particular way of thinking. So, clearly Quindlen is against this manipulation of literature, in these tests and in general, for a number of reasons, all logical. This kind of editing also sets a dangerous precedent where those in power of educating children have the ability to subject students to a particular worldview that they only assume is the best for everyone. This is quite audacious and ignores one of the hallmarks of American culture: diversity.

Explanation:

hope you get your thing correct

4 0
3 years ago
Which line from "Sugihara" is used to build suspense?
Nastasia [14]
The answer is C, CHIUNE: And if the Nazis find out . . . You and the children must return to Tokyo immediately. <span>
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify the complex sentence (IC+DC)
Dennis_Churaev [7]
The correct answer would be B, since complex sentences have 1 independent variable and one dependent variable.

The dependent variable would be: Everytime he hears a siren
Why? Because it is not a complete thought.

The independent variable would be: My dog howls loudly.
Why? This statement is a complete thought.

A would be a compound sentence
C would be a simple sentence
D would be compound complex.

Hope I could help!
4 0
3 years ago
Cumulative Exam
Butoxors [25]

Answer:

significance

Explanation:

also is this english 10 honors cumulative? if so, that's amazing, cuz i needed it too

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The City Mouse and the Country Mouse A City Mouse and a Country Mouse were acquaintances (friends), and the Country Mouse one da
    8·1 answer
  • FIRST TO ANSWER ALL THREE GETS BRAINLIEST&lt; ALSO WORTH 98 POINTS!!!!!
    13·2 answers
  • How is the “Victory Waits on Your Fingers” poster connected to the famous Rosie the Riveter image?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the main idea of this article? Cite three details (from the text) that support the main idea.
    11·2 answers
  • Why did women such as Abigail Adams want the right to vote? 
    6·2 answers
  • Peyton Farquhar was a well-to-do planter, of an old and highly respected Alabama family. Being a slave owner and like other slav
    8·2 answers
  • Please help me with 1,2,3,4 please
    15·1 answer
  • Match each aspect of writing with its definition,
    6·1 answer
  • The given sentence is in passive voice. Fill in the blank by choosing the correct option from the given set of options. The book
    10·2 answers
  • Progress Check
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!