Answer:
C. When the recipient was not included on the original email.
Explanation:
This is the correct option because forwarding allows the new recipient to see the email that was sent if they were not originally included.
~theLocoCoco
Answer: they had more security
Explanation:
To answer the question above as to Jean's explanation on Say's Law or The Law of Market.. I agree that "if there is a surplus of goods, there must be unmet of demand for others". Jean's explanation is more of a Capitalist style of management.
Answer:
e. All of the other choices
Explanation:
Product liability is the responsibility that a company bears for injury caused by its products as a result of a defect.
In this instance Musclematic, has known for the past year that this problem existed, but the company took no steps to warn people who owned or used these machines of the problem.
So for any injury users have they will be liable.
If Amanda files a lawsuit against Musclematic they will have to consider:
- How this litigation will affect its goodwill
- Whether or not a settlement with Amanda is a viable option
- Whether this suit will adversely affect other business relationships
- The costs associated with litigating this claim
This is because they will most likely lose the case.
The given statement "One way to think about free cash flow is that if the amount were withdrawn, it would harm the firm's ability to operate and to produce future cash flows" is FALSE.
Explanation:
Free flow of cash is the cash produced by an enterprise, less than the cost of asset spending. Free cash flow is the remaining cash after a corporation pays the operating costs and the equity, also called CAPEX.
FCF conflates net income through adjustments to non-cash spending, working capital shifts and capital expenditure.
The FCF is prone to volatility rather than net income as an indicator of profitability.
Nonetheless, FCF can expose basic problems until they emerge from the income declaration as a additional tool for analysis.