Answer:
The territories were ready to be claimed.
Explanation:
In the late 1700's- early 1900's, the constantly pushing Western boundary of the U.S. was colonized by settlers. Most of them got their land from the Homestead act, which gave farmers who lived on a plot of land total ownership of said land for living there for a period of time. There were also rancher, miners, and companies using the land up for their expansion.
Answer:
No because the people of the US protested against the violence with the Viatnamese and protested that the military withdrawal their troops from there lands.
Mr.Truman himself set a bomb to JAPAN and the cuban missle crisis
Answer: C
Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence. Explanation: Historians should avoid over simplification as such because it often ignores complex or contradictory evidence. Historians are saddled with the responsibility of trying to understand and decipher the past in order to predict the future.
Explanation: very well explained??
Answer:
The answer is d. All of the above.
Explanation:
Groups of Indians - villages or towns headed by a cacique or chief - were given to a Spanish landlord to work for him in his lands or properties. They also had to pay tributes to him. He was responsible for them. That was the system called "encomienda." Ironically, one the lord´s duties was to make them assimilate Christian beliefs and values, to lead a Christian life, but often they had too work too long and too much and there wasn´t time for cathecism left. Indians and their families were exploited and badly mistreated by the Spanish lords or "encomenderos." This sytem consolidated the state of Indians as a slave labor force and their subjugation, and it also was a good method used by the Spanish crown to pay all those Spanish men who had rendered services to it. Catholic priests and missionaries were among the early defenders of Indians.
