Answer:
The right covers a number of issues centered on the right of the accused or the defendant to refuse to comment or provide an answer when questioned, either prior to or during legal proceedings in a court of law.
Rodney can best be described as a <u>Revolutionary-Crusader</u> leader as he challenged the status quo and has been guided by adaptation by taking over the position of the divisional head.
<h3>Who is a leader?</h3>
A leader is a person who sets an example for their subordinates and guides them well by applying one of the leadership styles.
Revolutionary-Crusader is one of the archetypes in leadership. It refers to a leader who has challenged the status quo, that is, the current scenario of social or political concerns, and advocated a sense of adaptation among people.
Therefore, Rodney has been viewed as a Revolutionary-Crusader leader in accordance with the leadership archetypes.
Learn more about the leadership archetypes in the related link:
brainly.com/question/14656651
#SPJ1
Answer:
Drivers must always yield to the vehicle that arrived first
Explanation:
Answer:
Embezzlement is the act of withholding assets for the purpose of conversion of such assets, by one or more persons to whom the assets were entrusted, either to be held or to be used for specific purposes.
Explanation:
Hazirah can legally claim the remaining balance of Intan's debt because there was no acceptance of the offer from Johan that the part-payment should serve as full settlement.
<h3>What is the law of contract?</h3>
The law of contract deals with the enforcement of promises when certain elements are present. These contract elements include offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention.
Intan should remember that a valid and enforceable contract has conditions. We cannot claim there is an implied acceptance of Johan's offer. Johan cannot modify the contract terms between Intan and Hazirah because he was not a party to the contract.
Lastly, Johan did not offer any consideration for Hazirah to forfeit the balance of RM5,000. And Hazirah remained silent during Johan's informal negotiations without communicating her acceptance.
Thus, there was <u>no </u><u>contract</u><u> </u>between Johan and Hazirah, and Intan should do well to repay the balance.
Learn more about the elements of a contract at brainly.com/question/8116487
