1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ankoles [38]
2 years ago
5

Lincoln has been taking advantage of benson through an unfair contract for several years. eventually, benson seeks relief and le

gal freedom from his contract
Law
1 answer:
bezimeni [28]2 years ago
8 0

If a court finds that Lincoln has been taking advantage of Benson through an unfair contract for several years when Benson seeks relief and legal freedom, the <u>b) Contract is voided</u>.

<h3>What is an unfair contract?</h3>

An unfair contract is one that adversely affects the rights of one of the contracting parties.

Such an unfair contract is void.

By definition, a void contract is effectively illegitimate and unenforceable ab nitio.

<h3>Answer Options:</h3>

a) Contract will be modified

b) Contract is voided

c) Contract is voided, subject to investigation

d) Contract is valid

Thus, if a court finds that Lincoln has been taking advantage of Benson through an unfair contract for several years when Benson seeks relief and legal freedom, the <u>b) Contract is voided</u>.

Learn more about void contracts at brainly.com/question/7306383

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What happens it a state court disagrees with a federal court?
shepuryov [24]

Answer:

Then the federal court can review the decision based on the complaint/disagreement.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Of the following, which is the best definition of discourse
mezya [45]

Answer:

how should i know?

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
How might reading about a case or hearing about it on TV influence jurors?
IceJOKER [234]

Another way that media coverage changes the way that judges and juries act in the legal system, is by giving them extra information into the case, or the clients behind the case. ... This means that from the moment a juror enters the courtroom, they're already biased in the way they make decisions regarding the case.

3 0
3 years ago
Cindy’s air conditioning compressor makes such a racket when operating that Tom, whose bedroom window is but 15 feet away from t
Eva8 [605]

Answer:

I think the answer is public nuisance.

Explanation:

I believe this because it is not an invasion of privacy at all, it can't be trespassing because she is not trespassing, it is not intentional  even though she did ignore your claims.

Hope this helps.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following theorists argued that an individual’s personality is based on the id, the ego, and the superego?
    5·1 answer
  • Suppose that Georgia enacts a law requiring the use of contoured rear-fender mudguards on trucks and trailers operating within i
    15·1 answer
  • Which two amendments guarantee due process of law?
    5·1 answer
  • In June, Leslie wins a cash prize of $2,000. She plans to use this money to pay her tuition bill in September. Leslie puts this
    9·1 answer
  • Why do you think people shoplift? Why do so many teens shoplift? List three reasons.
    6·2 answers
  • The plain view doctrine refers to the power of law enforcement to seize any contraband materials that are in plain view, even if
    11·1 answer
  • How is a murder reported in georgia?
    12·1 answer
  • हेर्दैमा सुन्दर एवम् विशाल
    14·1 answer
  • Describe the electoral process in primary and general elections?
    10·1 answer
  • 21. Compensation for senators is
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!