1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Masja [62]
2 years ago
9

Which amendments prohibited denial of the right to vote because of race

Law
1 answer:
NikAS [45]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The fifteenth Ammendment prohibited denail of the right to vote because of race

Explanation:

The Fifteenth Ammendments to the Constitution of the United States ('XV') states that governments in the United States cannot prevent a citizen from voting because of their race, color, or prior condition of servitude (slavery). It was ratified on February 3, 1870.  Its basic objective was to grant the right to vote to former slaves.

The Voting Rights Act in 1965, made it possible to achieved the full promise of the fifteenth amendment in all states.

You might be interested in
1. Why is a different type of courage required to save lives?
vredina [299]

Answer:

The correct answer is

To stay safe in dangerous situations and avoid needless risks.

3 0
2 years ago
Define the principle of justice system
svetlana [45]
Justice is the need in a society to repay one for a wrong committed against them. It can be the system of punishing one for breaking a law of society, or it can mean that a person got what was coming to them when they committed a wrong
5 0
3 years ago
Research a supreme court decision. Tell me the for and against arguments in the court. And what it was about.
dem82 [27]

(Hint: Students do not have a First Amendment right to make obscene speeches in school.)

 Matthew N. Fraser, a student at Bethel High School, was suspended for three days for delivering an obscene and provocative speech to the student body. In this speech, he nominated his fellow classmate for an elected school office. The Supreme Court held that his free speech rights were not violated.

8 0
3 years ago
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burde
BigorU [14]

I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.

<h3>Who is a Defendant?</h3>

This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.

It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ  the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.

Read more about Defendant here brainly.com/question/7315287

#SPJ1

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Ten people are at a party. Two of them, with the knowledge and consent of the
    6·1 answer
  • The process shown in this diagram affected which outcome?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be an appropriate consequence for a small traffic violation?A.Paying a fineB.Paying restitutionC
    13·2 answers
  • How does U.S. foreign policy influence world affairs? Provide several examples in your short answer.
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ! need for today<br><br><br>PLEASE EXPLAIN
    14·2 answers
  • Hi, Im BrainlyVisionBot! I've Been Installed By Head Admin! I Will Report Any Presumptuous and Inappropriate Behavior! I Would L
    6·2 answers
  • 3. Compare and contrast the beginnings, jurisdiction and duties of State courts (Ch. 4) and Federal Courts (Ch. 3)?
    12·1 answer
  • Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution lists these types of powers that Congress does NOT possess.
    5·1 answer
  • This or That - <br><br>lose your best friend or have a bad relationship with your mom for a year
    15·1 answer
  • The Supreme Court Case New Jersey v. TLO questioned the rights students had in public schools. TLO was a New Jersey high school
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!