1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Masja [62]
3 years ago
9

Which amendments prohibited denial of the right to vote because of race

Law
1 answer:
NikAS [45]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The fifteenth Ammendment prohibited denail of the right to vote because of race

Explanation:

The Fifteenth Ammendments to the Constitution of the United States ('XV') states that governments in the United States cannot prevent a citizen from voting because of their race, color, or prior condition of servitude (slavery). It was ratified on February 3, 1870.  Its basic objective was to grant the right to vote to former slaves.

The Voting Rights Act in 1965, made it possible to achieved the full promise of the fifteenth amendment in all states.

You might be interested in
hen parents divorce and move to separate residences the parents who live in the same household as the children referred as the -
icang [17]

Answer:

custodial

Explanation:

when parents divorce and move to separate residences the parents who live in the same household as the children referred as the custodial parent.

A custodial parent is the parent who is given physical or legitimate authority of a youngster by court request. Joint physical guardianship, or shared child rearing, implies that the kid lives with the two guardians for rise to or around equivalent measures of time. In joint care, the two guardians are custodial guardians and neither one of the parents is a non-custodial parent.

5 0
3 years ago
A democratic government.
jenyasd209 [6]
What is the question for this?
3 0
3 years ago
Raymond Zukaitis was a physician practicing medicine in Douglas County, Nebraska. Aetna issued a policy of professional liabilit
ICE Princess25 [194]

Answer: The physician is being sued. Insurance company should provide an attorney. If the doctor is negligent, insurance company should pay (that's why we have premiums). Dr. Z is sued, goes to agency, and notifies the agency. The agency doesn't notify Aetna in right amount of time, and also notifies the wrong company. Aetna doesn't have a liability because they were not notified in a timely manner. Larson is agent to Aetna. A principal's notice to agent=notice to principal. That's the same as notifying Aetna according to its claims procedure. This is not Dr.Z's problem. Aetna is wrong in denying coverage, and Dr.Z will succeed and not have to pay.

8 0
4 years ago
*Court room*
kakasveta [241]

play cod with me tonight or your going to court

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Impact of teenagers should have weekend jobs​
muminat

Answer:

Yes so that they can be independent

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Should sexual offenders be granted probation?
    5·2 answers
  • If a crime is committed in Alpha Township within the county of Beta, which agency has primary investigative responsibility?
    10·1 answer
  • The role of the Judicial Branch of government is to make new law using the trial process.
    11·2 answers
  • Which is NOT a part of the purpose of law?
    9·1 answer
  • A body is found floating in a lake. The police division likely to be called to investigate would be
    11·2 answers
  • If you are deaf and communicate with sign language:
    6·1 answer
  • If arrested by private security, Miranda Rights are always provided.<br> False<br> True
    15·2 answers
  • 1. When one party in a contract agrees to release the other party from performance and enters
    10·1 answer
  • A case from the supreme court of north carolina is published in which west reporter?
    11·1 answer
  • There is no evidence that giving_____to your children makes them hyperactive.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!