1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vodomira [7]
2 years ago
13

1. How does a plat method legal description for a condominium unit differ from a plat method legal description for a single-fami

ly home within a subdivision?
Law
1 answer:
hoa [83]2 years ago
8 0

This is how they differ:

Explanation:

The plat method legal description is commonly used in the survey systems in government. It is kept in record in the county where the property is located. It refers to place the property is located in plat map thereby describing a specific parcel of the real property. It consists of

• Subdivision name

• Lot number

• Block number

• Plat book official number

• Page number in plat book

• County and state where plat was recorded

The plat method legal description is used for industrial parks, and single family homes inside a subdivisions.

You might be interested in
When there is a
Savatey [412]

Answer:

change in supply

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Kick kati b out kick katti b out
olga2289 [7]

Answer: sorry I don’t understand what your trying to say but if you need help with anything I will happily help you!

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain why Article I of the Constitution prevents a president of the United States from enacting a federal budget on his or her
ELEN [110]

Answer:

This is to ensure that there are enough checks and balances in the system to prevent the country’s decisions from being solely taken by just an individual in order to prevent mismanagement of public funds.

Explanation:

In the Article I of the US Constitution there is a provision that prevents the president from enacting a federal budget on his or her own, without the consent of other branches of the federal government.

This is to ensure financial accountability and prevent the high risk of misappropriation of funds if the President had the sole power to do so.

4 0
3 years ago
What potential conflict of interest is presented by a lawmaker accepting an
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

A term used to describe the situation in which a public official or fiduciary who, contrary to the obligation and absolute duty to act for the benefit of the public or a designated individual, exploits the relationship for personal benefit, typically pecuniary.

In certain relationships, individuals or the general public place their trust and confidence in someone to act in their best interests. When an individual has the responsibility to represent another person—whether as administrator, attorney, executor, government official, or trustee—a clash between professional obligations and personal interests arises if the individual tries to perform that duty while at the same time trying to achieve personal gain. The appearance of a conflict of interest is present if there is a potential for the personal interests of an individual to clash with fiduciary duties, such as when a client has his or her attorney commence an action against a company in which the attorney is the majority stockholder.

Incompatibility of professional duties and personal interests has led Congress and many state legislatures to enact statutes defining conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest and specifying the sanctions for violations. A member of a profession who has been involved in a conflict of interest might be subject to disciplinary proceedings before the body that granted permission to practice that profession.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which is the only program that covers nursing home care?
    11·2 answers
  • After you swallow an alcoholic drink, the alcohol is absorbed ...
    6·1 answer
  • An increase in government spending with no change in taxes leads to a
    11·1 answer
  • Match the items in the left column to the items in the right column.
    8·1 answer
  • Who does an agent represent during the solicitation of insurance
    14·1 answer
  • What theme and important messages did you find in the movie Great Debators
    12·1 answer
  • Which is easier to emend the Georgia constitution or the United States constitution
    5·2 answers
  • Which part of the U.S. constitution states, "...nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation."?
    12·2 answers
  • E. Write the difference between input device and output device​
    13·1 answer
  • In what way has the executive article fueled debate on presidential power?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!