Answer:
Authoritarian rule can be or cannot be legitimate because existence of pure legitimacy is not possible
Explanation:
The legitimacy represents outspoken public loyalty and conformist mentality of a individual /group/organization which shapes the repressive administrative machinery to be of a high developed nature. This is not possible in authoritarian regimes which leverage to facilitate certain sects of the society like elite group.
However, in current time pure legitimacy is also not possible hence the concept of authoritative legitimacy is arising.
Explanation:
In the 1830s, President Andrew Jackson pursued a policy of Indian Removal, forcing Native Americans living in Georgia, Florida, and Mississippi to trek hundreds of miles to territory in present-day Oklahoma.
The louisiana purchase formerly belonged to France
The answer is B. Development of railroad systems.
World War 1 because as Taskmasters said on this website, "Dadaism was an art movement of the European avant-garde, in the early 20th century, which was heavily influenced by World War I. It was anti-war and anti-bourgeois, and had political affinities with radical left. Some of the key figures of the Dada movement were: Hugo Ball, Emmy Hennings, Hans Arp, George Grosz, Max Ernst, Beatrice Wood, Tristan Tzara, Francis Picabia, etc. The movement influenced later styles in art such as Surrealism, Nouveau Realisme, pop art and Fluxus." (I quoted another guy's answer a.k.a. Taskmasters.
