What were goals of the French Revolution? Choose four answers.

1 answer:

3 0

The goals of the French Revolution were to write a constitution, end absolute rule, protect individual rights and end the class system.

What is French Revolution?

French Revolution, also called the Revolution of 1789 was a revolutionary movement that took place in France between 1787 and 1799. Its first climax was in 1789, hence the Revolution is called the Revolution of 1789. It sought to completely change the relationship between the rulers and those they governed and redefine political power's nature.

Causes of the French Revolution

The causes can be narrowed to four major factors.

Social – The social conditions in France in the late 18th century were extremely unequal and exploitative. The clergy and the nobility formed the first two Estates and were the most privileged classes in French society. They were exempt from payment of taxes to the State. On the other hand, the Third Estate which consisted of peasants and workers formed the majority of the population. They were burdened with excessive taxes with no political and social rights. As a result, they were extremely discontent.

Economic – As a result of numerous wars waged by Louis XVI the State coffers were empty. The situation was made even more complex by France’s involvement in the American War of Independence and the faulty system of taxation. While the privileged classes were excused from paying taxes the Third Estate was more and more burdened with them.

Political – The Bourbon king of France, Louis XVI was an extremely autocratic and weak-willed king who led a life of obscene luxury. This led to a lot of disenchantment among the masses who then were leading life of extreme poverty and widespread hunger.

Intellectual – The 18th century was marked by a conscious refusal by French thinkers of the ‘Divine Rights Theory’. Philosophers like Rousseau rejected the paradigm of absolute monarchy and promulgated the doctrine of equality of man and sovereignty of people. They played a pivotal role in exposing the fault lines of the old political system, i.e. the ancien regime, and articulating the popular discontent.

Goals of the French Revolution

The Bourbon monarchy was abolished in 1792 and replaced with the Republican form of government. France became a multiparty state as a result of the Revolution. The French Revolution introduced a rule of law. Before 1789, France had no constitution to safeguard people's rights and freedom. The constitution separated the executive, the judiciary, and the legislature. The French Revolution destroyed the social discriminative class system in France and declared equality for all. This led to the rise of the middle class who had acquired education to positions of responsibility and it led to the revival of the parliament which was abandoned for over 175 years. The revolution gave France a functional parliament with representatives who are democratically elected.

Impact of the French Revolution

The French Revolution changed modern history forever and many nations took inspiration from the ideologies it gave birth to. The suppressive monarchies were being challenged everywhere by the people. The ideas of liberty and equality spread all around the world over the years through the French armies.

So, The goals of the French Revolution were to write a constitution, end absolute rule, protect individual rights and end the class system.

To learn more about French Revolution, refer to:

brainly.com/question/24714204

#SPJ2

You might be interested in

For each of the following argument, indicate whether it is valid or invalid, strong or weak.?

kolezko [41]

Answer:

1. Invalid and weak

2. Invalid and strong.

Explanation:

The first argument does not present statements that support and justify it and for that reason, we can consider it a weak argument. In addition, the conclusion of the argument is not consistent with its premise, presenting a fallacy and causing wrong reasoning, which shows that the argument is invalid.

Similarly, the second argument has a conclusion that contradicts the information shown above, which invalidates the argument. However, the argument presents additional information that can support and justify it, for this reason, we can consider it a strong argument.

5 0

2 years ago

How was the United States able to gain more territory/ land and become larger in the 1800s?

Sav [38]

Answer:

In 1debate over the issue, Kentucky Senator Henry Clay proposed another compromise. It had four parts: first, California would enter the Union as a free state; second, the status of slavery in the rest of the Mexican territory would be decided by the people who lived there; third, the slave trade (but not slavery) would be abolished in Washington, D.C.; and fourth, a new Fugitive Slave Act would enable Southerners to reclaim runaway slaves who had escaped to Northern states where slavery was not allowed.

Bleeding Kansas

But the larger question remained unanswered. In 1854, Illinois Senator Stephen A. Douglas proposed that two new states, Kansas and Nebraska, be established in the Louisiana Purchase west of Iowa and Missouri. According to the terms of the Missouri Compromise, both new states would prohibit slavery because both were north of the 36º30’ parallel. However, since no Southern legislator would approve a plan that would give more power to “free-soil” Northerners, Douglas came up with a middle ground that he called “popular sovereignty”: letting the settlers of the territories decide for themselves whether their states would be slave or free.

Northerners were outraged: Douglas, in their view, had caved to the demands of the “slaveocracy” at their expense. The battle for Kansas and Nebraska became a battle for the soul of the nation. Emigrants from Northern and Southern states tried to influence the vote. For example, thousands of Missourians flooded into Kansas in 1854 and 1855 to vote (fraudulently) in favor of slavery. “Free-soil” settlers established a rival government, and soon Kansas spiraled into civil war. Hundreds of people died in the fighting that ensued, known as “Bleeding Kansas.”

A decade later, the civil war in Kansas over the expansion of slavery was followed by a national civil war over the same issue. As Thomas Jefferson had predicted, it was the question of slavery in the West–a place that seemed to be the emblem of American freedom–that proved to be “the knell of the union.”

7 0

3 years ago

After the Republic Army of the North easily captures Nacogdoches many more soldiers join the fight for independence.

irakobra [83]

Answer:

the answer is false

Explanation:

i took the quiz

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help anwser this question please as soon as possible.