Answer:
The answer is National Security argument
Explanation:
In this question, the woman is arguing on the basis of national security as the over-reliance on foreign countries for something as important as one used in making weapons for defense does not appeal to her. From her point of view, she does not argue from an "unfair competition" point of view, neither is she arguing because she is a little player in the industry. Her point is valid as it is a threat to national security to depend on the purchase of a very important item that is used in the manufacture of weapons for defense.
The Texas sheepherder probably means that because of the grass, they are still able to crop and have some food to eat. #17) "Holds the earth together" probably means that other than the grass earth is also something that helps save us all because without earth we can not have grass.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The marriage would affect how the output in the economy is calculated by decreasing the labor strength of the economy as the butler is no longer a butler the husband of the woman who employed him.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- In the given case, the output of the economy is very less likely to get affected as the butler and the woman have chosen to continue working in the same way they did before they got married.
- The only difference that would be recorded would thus be in the labor strength of the economy which would be observed to have decreased.
The millitary rule was initially created to guarantee the safety of the freed Slaves in the southern region, but over period of time, the millitary rules seems to be less necessary since the majority people had accept the fact that they could no longer treat the African American as slaves (even though many still not happy about it)
On top of that, <span>Rutherford B. Hayes received a lot of pressure from Democratic party at that time and being threatened into a filibuster if He refused to did a compromise and retract the last remaining troops from the South.</span>
