The marriage would affect how the output in the economy is calculated by decreasing the labor strength of the economy as the butler is no longer a butler the husband of the woman who employed him.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
In the given case, the output of the economy is very less likely to get affected as the butler and the woman have chosen to continue working in the same way they did before they got married.
The only difference that would be recorded would thus be in the labor strength of the economy which would be observed to have decreased.
The statement is true. In the case Feiner v. New York, Chief
Justice Fred Vinson discussed in his opinion that the Court has used the “clear
and present danger” principle. The chief justice believes that the arrest of
Feiner was necessary in order to protect “the interest of the community in
maintaining peace and order on its streets”.
