Answer:
C.
Explanation:
A plan devised by FDR to add new justices to the Supreme Court who would rule in favor ofNew Deal Legislation.
In order to provide a piece of evidence to compare the level of the Incas’ and Maya culture’s investments in public works projects, you can mention the following:
As regards Incas' architecture: Qollqa were stone houses situated on hillsides. They had drainage canals in order to keep the interior dry. Another example can be Machu Picchu that was a settlement like a fortress (located in the High Andes of Perú)
As regards Mayas' architecture: its region consisted of the northern lowlands, their pyramids relied on intricately carved stone. They built temples like 'The Temple of the Cross at Palenque. Usually, their structures were covered with stucco to smooth imperfections. Besides, their structures were aligned so as to have an astronomical observation.
A) "Was originally in favor of slavery, but now is that party that is viewed as championing rights of minorities." In fact, they were in favor of slavery, and nowadays they look after minority groups such as immigrants, women, African Americans, etc.
C) "Had the only presidential candidate that was elected for three consecutive terms.". Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected President for three consecutive terms.
D) "Held control of the Senate for over 30 years." The Democratic party has controlled the Congress and the White House for over 30 years in the past 100 years.
The correct answer is "Sweatt ruled that “separate but equal” graduate and professional schools were constitutional. Brown overturned that decision."
<em>"Sweatt vs Painter" </em>ruling was successful in challenging the "separate but equal" doctrine of racial segregation established by previous case "Plessy vs Fergusson". Sweatt ultimately won the case when the Supreme Court concluded that Thurgood Marshall School of Law failed to qualify for being a "separate but equal" educational institution, as it lacked the sufficient facilities to become one.
<em>"Brown vs Board of Education"</em> ruling effectively overturned the ruling of the <em>"Plessy vs Fergusson case"</em>, when the Supreme Court indicated that state laws that permitted separate public schools were unconstitutional.
Personally, I don't think so.
Every information we have is by principle, biased. We can never have a full picture on the issue (we don't live long enough to have ALL the information and all the other people's opinions) so this means that we only know a selection of relevant information. This selection biases our perception of the issue: so in this way, I think that we are bound to be at least a little bit biased.
