1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zina [86]
3 years ago
5

HELPP ASAP!!!!!!!!!!

History
1 answer:
s344n2d4d5 [400]3 years ago
8 0

The actions like the bombing of Dresden or the dropping of the atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not treated as war crimes mainly because of two reasons, one being that they were attacks on the aggressor countries, and the other being that the courts that were charging for war crimes were pretty much in the hands of the winning side.

I personally do not agree with that, as in those attacks the main victims were civilians that had nothing to do with the war, so by any logic that is a war crime. Also, the effects of these attacks were long lasting, and even nowadays there's consequences from some them as they have a long lasting radiation. Any attack on innocent people with deadly weapons is a war crime, thus those should have been put in the same ''bucket''.

You might be interested in
Which statement proves that the 1970s oil crisis had a positive effect on Texas?
Alex777 [14]

The right answer is A) Government loans gave the oil industry a second chance to boom

The first oil shock began in October 1973, when OPEC member Arab countries embargoed oil supplies to the United States, Japan, and Western Europe in retaliation for the occupation of Palestinian territories by the Israelis during the Yom Kippur War. The embargo forced some European countries and Japan to ration energy and led the world into recession. With the deficit in the supply of this commodity the American government intervened and fomented the economy so that it could survive the crisis that was instated and Texas petroleum became an improvised exit.

7 0
3 years ago
Recommendations ( 200 words)<br> References on Sir syed Ahmed khan plz somebody help me​
gogolik [260]

Answer:

                     

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
In which landmark case did the Supreme Court find a Virginian law preventing marriage between people of different races unconsti
laiz [17]
 b i think
hope it helps

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the late 1800s, all factory jobs made it possible for immigrants to live very well.
V125BC [204]

the answer to the question is false

5 0
3 years ago
rue or False - Pilgrims wanted to separate from the Church of England while Puritans wanted to purify it
mihalych1998 [28]

False. Most Pilgrims were Puritans, and Puritans themselves wanted to separate themselves from the church of England.

hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Write a short paragraph (3-4 sentences) that gives your opinion on the US decision to invade Iraq. You should describe whether y
    11·2 answers
  • Who is a citizen of the United States? What are the rights of a citizen of the United States?
    10·1 answer
  • By the 1670s, the stern religious rules of the original _____ had less influence over New England.
    13·2 answers
  • How did mutinies (or rebellions) affect the French and Russian army?
    10·1 answer
  • Does a person's name influence the person they become?​
    8·2 answers
  • what are poems that tell stories and legends of early civilizations? a bureaucracies b.epics.c.frescoes.d.cave paintings​
    13·1 answer
  • Which president's election in 1876 marked the end of congressional Reconstruction and protection of former slaves' civil rights
    7·2 answers
  • A smaller country that is being guarded by another country is a _____.
    9·2 answers
  • How does the constitution promote the value of independence for the Supreme Court?
    14·1 answer
  • How many countries did Adolf Hitler conquer? ​
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!