Answer:B desert.
Explanation: Deserts have low rain, and plants and animals have to adapt to life there.
The deli industry is monopolistically competitive. If some delis leave the industry, Toby's <u>demand</u> curve will shift <u>right</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Monopolistic competition is similar to perfect competition in that firms in both market structure. In monopolistic competition the firms earn zero economic profits in the long run.
One of the best examples for monopolistic competition is gas station.
The demand curve is the graphical representation of the relationship between the cost of the goods or services and the quantity demand for the product for specific period of time.
Shifting of the demand curve to right shows that there is increase in demand for the product.
Answer:
variable costs
Explanation:
According to my research on monopolistically competitive firms, I can say that based on the information provided within the question they will continue to produce as long as the revenue covers variable costs. This term is defined as the costs that change as the quantity of the product that is being produced changes.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
