All categories

3 years ago

How was the impact of the mexican cession in 1848 similar to the impact of the louisiana purchase in 1803?

1 answer:

4 0

he Mexican Cession is the region in the modern-day southwestern United States that Mexico ceded to the U.S. in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848. This region had not been part of the areas east of the Rio Grande which had been claimed by the Republic of Texas, though the Texas annexation resolution two years earlier had not specified the southern and western boundary of the new State of Texas. The Mexican Cession (529,000 sq. miles) was the third largest acquisition of territory in US history. The largest was the Louisiana Purchase, with some 827,000 sq. miles, followed by the acquisition of Alaska (about 586,000 sq. miles).

You might be interested in

In which two nations or religions of the world did europeans primarily establish colonies during new imperialism

Alona [7]

____________________________________________________

Answer:

Your answers would be:

Africa

Mexico

____________________________________________________

The two nations or regions of the world that the Europeans primarily establish colonies during new imperialism was in Africa and Mexico. They expanded their colonies there.

____________________________________________________

Definition:

New Imperialism:

The new imperialism for the Europeans was when they went to other regions to expand their colony. They wanted to get more territory for themselves.

____________________________________________________

Explanation:

The reason why the places, Africa and Mexico, would be the correct answer because the Europeans found these places was very rich in certain items and materials.

Why they established colonies in Africa:

The reason why European decided to colonize Africa was because Africa had a very specific material that the Europeans found to help out their colony, and that was Metal. Africa was pretty much known for the amount of metal it had, and the Europeans wanted to utilize it. The Europeans spread their colony into Africa so they can get the natural resource, metal, and take it back to Europe. Metal was a rich natural resource that everyone wanted during the new imperialism, specifically during the time of the industrial revolution. They were part of what was known as the "Scramble for Africa."

Why they established colonies in Africa:

The reason why Mexico would be another place the Europeans decided to colonize was because Mexico was rich in oil and crops. Oil is a very expensive and rich resource that everyone wanted to get a hold of, and Europe was one of them. Oil could be used for many things, and Europe wanted to have a lot of it to help out their industries. Because of how rich the natural resource is, Europe decided to establish a colony there. Mexico also had a lot of crops, which made it easy for people there to get a hold of some food, and that benefited the Europeans because they had a food source and didn't have to really worry about not having enough food to survive.

____________________________________________________

Why the other answer choices are incorrect:

The other answer choices: South Africa, India, and Japan would be incorrect because:

South Africa is incorrect because:

The Europeans wanted ALL of Africa, and this was known as the "Scramble for Africa." They didn't want one part of it, they wanted all of it

India is incorrect because:

This was not a place where they established colonies during the new imperialism.

Japan is incorrect because:

This was not a place where they established colonies during the new imperialism.

____________________________________________________

-Julie

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why did Henry Grady say the south lost the civil war

kogti [31]

Answer:

When I moved to Charlotte, NC, in 1986, I visited local museums to learn about the city. One museum caught my eye – the Levine Museum of the New South. Its permanent exhibit – Cotton Fields to Skyscrapers – “uses Charlotte and its 13 surrounding counties as a case study to illustrate the profound changes in the South since the Civil War.” The “New South” – a term Atlanta newspaperman Henry W. Grady coined in a speech to the New England Society of New York on December 21, 1886 – is familiar to many American history teachers. In his speech, Grady, the first southerner to speak to the Society, claimed that the old South, the South of slavery and secession, no longer existed and that southerners were happy to witness its demise. He refused to apologize for the South’s role in the Civil War, saying, “the South has nothing to take back.” Instead, the dominant theme of Grady’s speech, according to New South historian Edward L. Ayers, “was that the New South had built itself out of devastation without surrendering its self-respect.” Tragically, Grady and most of his fellow white southerners believed maintaining their self-respect required maintaining white supremacy.

Explanation:

Grady, then the 46-year-old editor-publisher of the Atlanta Constitution, was one of the leading advocates of the New South creed. In New York, he won over the crowd of prominent businessmen, including J.P. Morgan and H.M. Flagler, with tact and humor. He praised Abraham Lincoln, the end of slavery, and General William T. Sherman, whom he called “an able man” although a bit “careless with fire.” Grady reassured the northern businessmen that the South accepted her defeat. He was glad “that human slavery was swept forever from American soil” and the “American Union saved.” He urged northern investment in the South as a means of cementing the reunion of the war-torn nation. He claimed progress in racial reconciliation in the South and begged forbearance by the North as the South wrestled with “the problem” of African Americans’ presence in the South. Grady asked whether New England would allow “the prejudice of war to remain in the hearts of the conquerors when it has died in the hearts of the conquered?” Grady’s audience cheered his call for political and economic reunion – albeit at the cost of African American rights. The term “New South” was used in the 20th century to refer to other concepts. Moderate governors of the late 20th century – including Terry Sanford of North Carolina, Jimmy Carter of Georgia, and George W. Bush of Texas – were called New South governors because they combined pro-growth policies with so-called “moderate” views on race. Others used the phrase to summarize modernization in southern cities such as Charlotte, Atlanta, Richmond, and Birmingham, and the region’s increasing economic and demographic diversity. However, all uses of the term have suggested the intersection between economic development and racial justice in the South during Reconstruction, the Jim Crow Era, the Civil Rights Era and today.

3 0

1 year ago

After the civil war, many ex-slaves traveled throughout the south. what was the reality for these ex-slaves?

777dan777 [17]

They were wondering in search of their lost family members, they were constantly in danger, with a possibility of being killed, secretly enslaved or beaten up harshly. Their lives for sure were quite bitter even after the civil war. After all, the war could not change the point of view of the landowners in the South in a fingerclick, that required much more time and patience.

8 0

3 years ago

What is a empire , give the definition and explain how Alexander the Greats conquest apply

morpeh [17]

Alexander the Great was so impressed by the Indian use of elephants in battle, that he immediately enlisted them into his army. ... Alexander's the Great's tutor was the Greek philosopher Aristotle. In 338 B.C.E., King Philip of Macedon invaded and conquered the Greek city-states.

6 0

2 years ago

PLZZZ ANSWER NY QUESTION , I WILL CHOOSE YOU AS BRAINLIEST!!!

Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

resented

less money

late 19th century

limit

reinforced

dictation

power

literacy

writing

unknown

Plss brainliest!!!

4 0

3 years ago