Evgeny Morozov differs and says that while online networking may have helped, it's not clear the amount it really contributed. I contended in my post that Twitter is successfully only a specialized instrument like the phone just a great deal more circulated and substantially quicker and consequently makes it simpler to spread data, which can help activists in spots like Tunisia bring issues to light about what they are doing.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
below are the choices:
a.Liberty
<span>b.Popular Sovereignty </span>
<span>c.Pluralism </span>
<span>d.Equality
</span>Popular Sovereignty
<span>You don't know the power commanded by the oligarchs with their bribes, lobbying, and subsidies. Your vote doesn't even count anymore. What we have lost is the ability of the commoner to get a say for what others are going to do. Special interests, complicated partisan maneuvering, political standstill on every level makes the rise of the Sith a very real possibility in our government.</span>
Answer: The hardy-weinberg equilibrium is a principle stating that the genetic variation in a population will remain constant from one generation to the next in the absence of disturbing factors.
Answer:Emotional contagion
Explanation:Emotional contagion is the phenomenon of being influenced by someone else emotion or where someone else's emotions evokes the same emotions from the individuals around them. It can be direct or indirect sometimes just by conscious imagining and analysing another person's emotions we may begin to feel what they feel.
This can create emotional synchrony between people which strengthen the relationship.
Example of emotional contagion is when you find your friend crying it is likely that you will also beging to feel sad and might even cry too.
The answer is secret service
