Though these segments aren't marked congruent in the diagram, the two lines inside the circle making up the bases of the triangles are congruent as all radii are congruent. So the triangles are congruent by SAS.
![\bf \textit{vertical parabola vertex form with focus point distance} \\\\ 4p(y- k)=(x- h)^2 \qquad \begin{cases} \stackrel{vertex}{(h,k)}\qquad \stackrel{focus~point}{(h,k+p)}\qquad \stackrel{directrix}{y=k-p}\\\\ p=\textit{distance from vertex to }\\ \qquad \textit{ focus or directrix}\\\\ \stackrel{"p"~is~negative}{op ens~\cap}\qquad \stackrel{"p"~is~positive}{op ens~\cup} \end{cases} \\\\[-0.35em] \rule{34em}{0.25pt}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ctextit%7Bvertical%20parabola%20vertex%20form%20with%20focus%20point%20distance%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%204p%28y-%20k%29%3D%28x-%20h%29%5E2%20%5Cqquad%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20%5Cstackrel%7Bvertex%7D%7B%28h%2Ck%29%7D%5Cqquad%20%5Cstackrel%7Bfocus~point%7D%7B%28h%2Ck%2Bp%29%7D%5Cqquad%20%5Cstackrel%7Bdirectrix%7D%7By%3Dk-p%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%20p%3D%5Ctextit%7Bdistance%20from%20vertex%20to%20%7D%5C%5C%20%5Cqquad%20%5Ctextit%7B%20focus%20or%20directrix%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cstackrel%7B%22p%22~is~negative%7D%7Bop%20ens~%5Ccap%7D%5Cqquad%20%5Cstackrel%7B%22p%22~is~positive%7D%7Bop%20ens~%5Ccup%7D%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20%5Crule%7B34em%7D%7B0.25pt%7D)

something noteworthy is that the squared variable is the "x", thus the parabola is a vertical one, the "p" value is negative, so is opening downwards, and the h,k is pretty much the origin,
vertex is at (0,0)
the focus point is "p" or 5 units down from there, namely at (0, -5)
the directrix is "p" units on the opposite direction, up, namely at y = 5
the focal width, well, |4p| is pretty much the focal width, in this case, is simply yeap, you guessed it, 20.
Answer:
6^3 = 216 ( to the power of three )
Answer:
Year 2: 109.4%
Year 3: 118.9%
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>Given;</h3>
- Ash company reported sales of $580,000 for year 1
- $630,000 for year 2,
- $680,000 for year 3.
Now,
For the revenue trend percent for year 2
Year 2: $580,000 / $530,000 × 100 = 109.4%
For the revenue trend percent for year 3
Year 3: $630,000 / $530,000 × 100 = 118.9%
Thus, The answer is 109.4% and 118.9%.
<u>-TheUnknownScientist 72</u>
Answer: (5.5, -4)
Step-by-step explanation:
You can use the midpoint formula to find the midpoint of point A and point B.

x₁ = 8
x₂ = 3
y₁ = -7
y₂ = -1





Midpoint = (5.5, -4)
Hope this helps!