1) Using wide-spread universal terms that do not deal with the specific issues at hand. [GLITTERING GENERALITIES]
2) Using broad accusations and negative attacks in order to bring down the reputation of an opponent. [NAME CALLING]
3) "All of these Hollywood stars say that you should vote for Governor Tibet." [TESTIMONIALS]
4) Projecting the image of being one of the common people. [PLAIN FOLKS]
Because some people don't care what others think
I believe the answer is twitter
It would be more logical to have an abundant amount of resources than to be in a center of a training route. Thomas Jefferson's Embargo Act of 1807 is an example. America suffered more even though it was meant to punish France and Great Britain. If America had more supplies then they wouldn't have any issue with trading with someone else. America is across the sea so it is hard to believe they were in the center of the training route.
Having a good location is important, but if there isn't enough to trade then that creates more issues. One would be that the area could become a reputation for being unreliable. It does come to the question if the loads of resources is worth traveling for or to take a route that's faster but there isn't a lot of give. Being isolated also means that of there happens to be an issue in the trade then the location is either off the maps or people don't want to there because of the distance and the prices might be able to go up. That's why resources are better than location.
According to the sociologists, the main cause for high divorce rates in the 1960s was <span>an increase in women working outside of the home, and also, greater social acceptance of divorce. The women had a changed social position and were more independent and able to finance themselves.</span>
