Answer: Plagiarism.
Explanation:
While it is completely appropriate to draw on someone else's findings and conclusions in your work, it is punishable to present them as your own. Plagiarism happens when we use someone else's ideas without listing that individual as a source. It is considered as a serious breach of academic ethics.
It is not allowed to use other people's ideas without citing them, but it is also punishable to mix your own previous work with new without permission. This is known as <em>self-plagiarism</em>.
The 3rd one is your correct answer. :3
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Which of the following statements is the inverse of "If you do not understand geometry, then you do not know how to reason deductively."?
A. If you reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
B. If you do not reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Answer:
The inverse of that statement is:
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Explanation:
To determine the inverse of a statement, we must negate both the hypothesis and the conclusion. In this case, the hypothesis is "if you do not understand geometry." It is already a negative sentence, which means its negation is "if you understand geometry." The same goes for the conclusion "then you do not know how to reason deductively." Its negation is "then you [know how to ] reason deductively." Putting them together, we have "If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively." - letter C
Financially, parents are expected to provide food and clothing for their child.
