Answer: 2 inches, 3 inches, or 3.125 and 2.083
Explanations:
The simplest way is to take 20% of the 2.5 inches and go that much above & below 2.5 inches.
2.5 x 20% = 2.5 x 0.20 = 0.5
So 2.5 - 0.5 = 2 inches was predicted
And 2.5 + 0.5 = 3 inches was predicted.
The more complicated way is to see number + 20% of that number = 2.5, and what number - 20% = 2.5.
Which solution sounds more like what you’re doing in class right now?
If it’s the more complicated way:
0.8x = 2.5 (80% of the predicted rain value equals 2.5)
x = 3.125 inches was predicted
1.2x = 2.5 (120% of the predicted rain value equals 2.5)
x = 2.083 inches was predicted
Sorry, this is probably confusing. Let me know what questions you have.
Angles 2 and 6 are corresponding angles, which would explain why they are congruent if lines a and b are parallel, but there is nothing in the problem to explain that any of the angles equals 60 degrees since no measurements were given in the diagram.
Answer:
m8 its (3x)^1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
The base case is the claim that
which reduces to
which is true.
Assume that the inequality holds for <em>n</em> = <em>k </em>; that
We want to show if this is true, then the equality also holds for <em>n</em> = <em>k</em> + 1 ; that
By the induction hypothesis,
Now compare this to the upper bound we seek:
because
in turn because
Answer:
H is less than of equal to 8
Step-by-step explanation:
