The answer to the question above is "C) Precedent" which is the kind of reasoning that Justice Fortas uses to support his argument when he refers to Keyishian v Board of Regents in the majority opinion for Tinker v Des Moines<span>. The precedent is the kind of reasoning which a person uses by using legal aspect support. Abe Fortas is a man with a law background. Thus, precedent is the most likely kind of reasoning he uses.</span>
Answer:
D. Carl Albert's mission is to provide exceptional education that fosters student success.
Explanation:
Hope it helps.
It's a clause, your welcome; a clause is a sentence/group of words that offers a viable subject and verb, phrases on the other hand DO NOT.
I think there are trying to scare us or something
