The answer is A. Kotowski cites four scholars who specialize in the study of volcanoes, whereas Ferguson cites only the encyclopedia.
The given thesis is arguing that Kotowski is more reliable than Ferguson because he backs up his statements with a greater number of more reliable sources. In choice A, Kotowski is not only using three more sources than Ferguson, but they're sources from reputable specialists, making them higher quality sources as well.
If you're still confused, you can use elimination to rule out the others:
B. B doesn't work because there's no mention of the rate of volcanic change in the thesis. Although the statement may be true, it's not evidence to support the writer's claim.
C. C doesn't work because there's no mention of the frequency of volcanic eruption in the thesis. Again, although the statement may be true, it doesn't necessarily support the writer's claim.
D. D doesn't work because there's no mention of the similarities between the two pieces. If the thesis is arguing that Kotowski's work is different from Ferguson's because it's more reliable, it'd be counterproductive for the writer to mention the similarities of the work. Therefore, this "evidence" has no relation to the thesis and would not support the author's thesis.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Take your favorite movie, change the names of the characters and the titel, make a similiar story with a different ending or different place
Hello, you did not show the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible to answer it accurately. However, if an author wants to offer information about Macarthism without offering opinions to the reader, the option that must be made is "by presenting only the facts that support a particular view of the era."
This allows the author to explain what was happening, to present important points about Macarthism, to show how it fit into the community, without presenting any opinion, but maintaining the reader's understanding.
I think the answer is the third one
Answer:
the man behind us said that he had already seen the movie
