Answer:
Its D
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Sybil may have confused the units, since 65 centimetres is 6.5 meters The correct length of the desk in meters is 0.65 because a centimetre is 0.01 of a meter.
Step-by-step explanation:
Her desk is actually 65 centimetre long . She made an error and conclude the length of her desk is 6.5 meter long. She made a mistake in her conversion .
1 centimetre = 0.01 meters
65 centimetres = ? meters
cross multiply
65 × 0.01 = 0.65 meters
A centimetre is equal to 0.01 meters. Therefore, using that conversion rate 65 centimetres will evaluate to 0.65 meters.
The actual length of her desk in meters is 0.65. She made an error when converting her desk length from centimetres to meters.
Answer:
2 and 3. Hope it helps.
Step-by-step explanation:
It says it has no 90 degree sides, so it’s not 3. A rhombus does not have congruent diagonals. An isosceles trapezoi has congruent diagonals. It depends on what type of kite you are using, but there diagonals can be congruent if there definition allows them to be a rhombus. I think that the answer is most likely 3.
Again using the information from the last explanation, it cannot be 4 and 3. A rhombus is a rectangle. A square is also a rectangle, so it is not 1 either. That leaves 2 as the only option that makes sense.
Hey, i dont know what bantu jawab ya guys mean
The factors are: x-5 and x+3
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
Simplifying
Let us define the zero product property first
The zero product property states that
if ab=0 then either a=0 or b=0
So,
Hence,
the factors are: x-5 and x+3
Keywords: Factorization, Zero product property
Learn more about factorization at:
#LearnwithBrainly