The commander-in-chief role addresses major problems, while the chief of state role is mostly symbolic.
Arguments for Colonization:
- It helps the colonized countries learned about the advancement in technology that possess by the country that colonize them.
Arguments against colonization
- It create an economic stagnation in the colonized country since their reosurces were extremely exploited by the colonziation
- It create deep resentment among the target of colonziation, which lead to many violent revolution
- It turned the governemtn away form its own people. In order to colonize a country, the government of the colinized country tend to be bribed so it can pass the legislations that benefit the colonization.
Harrison Ford. He is the man who played Han Solo.
<span>sets up National banking system
concordat- agreement w/pope restoring Catholicism
Napoleonic Code- uniform system of laws</span>
The correct answer is D. In both regions, Mongols allowed the previous administrators to continue to rule.
In both Persia and Russia, the Mongols had a regional governor, and to help them they recruited staff among the local population, they usually recruited people that came from lettered families and by hereditary basis. Historians have pointed out that Russians were trained by the Mongols to take orders, to pay taxes and to supply soldiers without delay, future czars also used the same techniques later on.
This caused the population to feel “part of the power” and this way they would be against a revolt for example. It was also a way of being closer to the population by taking some of them to work with the new “government”.
