Answer:
B. Trial, appellate, and high courts.
Explanation:
The federal court is court system that is usually in charge of lawsuit between either two states in a country, a country and citizens, a country and other countries etc. While the state court system have an authority to decide on cases between citizens in a state, a state and its citizens, etc.
Both courts operate on the same set of laws that has been established in cognizance of with the country's constitution. Therefore the verdict by either system is based on justification and purity. A major similarity between the two systems is trial, appellate, and high courts.
Answer:
If the outcomes of other procedure that were used are similar to the omitted procedure by giving relevant evidence.
Explanation:
Generally, it is common practice to use the same procedure for a given set of actions to obtain the desired result. This serves as a routine work and the outcome is always the same if the same procedure is followed each time. However, if there exists an alternative method or procedure that will give a similar outcome to the omitted procedure, there is no need to perform the omitted method/procedure.
I believe it is d) alliance pact hope this helps!
Please make me brainliest!
Answer:
The buyer has no recourse because he/she did not specify which one he wanted included in the purchase agreement
Explanation:
In the purchase agreement, the seller made an offer buy the buyer failed to specify exactly what he/she wanted and the colour or arrangement, The buyer failed to clarify the terms for the purchase agreement hence he cannot sue the seller.
