The question is asking for a kind of theory or framework that assumes that increasing a contact within groups will diminish conflict or negative behaviour between the groups.
The answer is: contact hypothesis.
This hypothesis basically states that if people have contact with other people, they won't think about them as "the other" but will have an increased understanding and positive association with them.
Answer: Because knowing the people who are part of the government allows them to know who is doing a good job for the nation and who is not.
Explanation:
Some people underestimate the importance of knowing who are the people who over the years are part of the presidential cabinet when in reality it should be the opposite. Every citizen must know the political history of his country so that in the future he will not repeat those disasters that at some time could lead the nation to its economic and social loss.
The government is responsible for the welfare of citizens. It is responsible for making decisions that contribute to the growth of the nation. When a ruler does not fulfill what was promised and only occupies positions for its benefit, citizens know that this type of person should not be the president of the nation. This helps them know who they should choose in the future.
Citizens are responsible for choosing who will be their rulers, so people must know the political and professional trajectory that future candidates have and thus be able to determine who will do a good job and who will not.
A town that does not stay informed tends to fail. Make bad decisions and then be sorry for what they have done. They blame the people in power, but forget that it was they who put those leaders in government.
Each of the leaders who have ruled a country marks a before and after. They leave changes in the country that can be both positive and negative, the people must follow up to think that it is in fact that it is convenient for them. Citizens must know all the steps that governments are taking since certain decisions can negatively influence the country and citizens are those who have to pay the consequences.
The french were in canada
Answer:
Honestly we (homo sapiens) made alot of improvements through the last decade, is mildly concerning on how fast we grown and what we have now compared 20 years ago, we're now relying on small portable devices to keep us occupied, and now a major part of our lives, but we also have better meds, devies to help people and new treatments which save lifes, I a teen born from the mid 2000's Find it odd growing up now depending on a phone to help me out and stuff, but just a few years ago I never bother with screen entertainment, I used to play in the mud its changed so much in the past few years its amazing to me but again cornering if we'll be relying too much on devices
It might begin to flatten or rip apart. it's like grabbing a football by each end and tearing and pulling on it
