All categories

1 year ago

The fact that no national military under the articles of confederation was a a weakness in which area of the government

2 answers:

8 0

The fact that no national military under the articles of confederation was a a weakness in the administrative part of government.

<h3>What is articles of confederation?</h3>

This is what shows how powers are share amongst the tiers of government. It essentially place more power to the state government.

The articles of confederation outline the roles of the central government after it gotten independence.

Hence, the fact that no national military under the articles of confederation was a a weakness in the administrative part of government.

Learn more about articles of confederation here: brainly.com/question/10100517

#SPJ1

MAVERICK [17]1 year ago

6 0

The fact that no national military under the articles of confederation was a a weakness in<u> </u><u>administrative</u> area of the government.

<h3>What is the Articles of Confederation? Why did it had a weak military?</h3>

Article of Confederation is the written document, that consists the constitution of the United States. It was written in 1777.

The government under the Article of Confederation lacked the military and army power. In 1781, it tried to established the strong military system for the defense of the United States.

According to the Articles of Confederation, Congress had the sole power to make peace and war, but it did not have the authority to raise an army of its own.

Learn more about the constitution of the United States here:-

brainly.com/question/13999176

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Federal appeals courts are also known as circuit courts. True or False?

Vladimir79 [104]

Federal appeals courts are also known as circuit courts. True

5 0

2 years ago

Making changes in response to problems or opportunities as they arise, rather than attempting to foresee them, is referred to as

artcher [175]

Answer:

Reactive

Explanation:

Reactive change involves making changes or responding to problems as they occur rather than anticipating or foreseeing them.

Reactive change occurs when an organization makes changes in its practices after some threat or opportunity has already occurred. This type of change is often counter productive in the long run as it does not give time for an appropriate response since it was not anticipated. Often times, it is rather destabilizing as this require a much greater effort to overcome as compared to if it was a proactive change.

5 0

3 years ago

Witnesses are often called in both civil and criminal cases to testify about their knowledge of events related to the case. Why

Snowcat [4.5K]

Because the witnesses had different viewpoints so they might have seen different things..
If for example the witness is somehow related to the victim, his/her point of view might have been compromised and couldn't be used

hope this helps

7 0

3 years ago

Question 2 (3 points)

Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

Americans experienced a dramatic rise in the availability of new time-saving appliances for the household during this period.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

According to Erickson, the best explanation for the second experience of the Spirit after regeneration in Acts, was due to the f

drek231 [11]

Answer:

given statement is true

Explanation:

As Erickson Millard J. Erickson is a theologian and professor, who was born in the United States on June 24, 1932, and died at the age of 87. Millard J. According to Erikson, the disciples were resurrected before they could be understood and received. Because the Holy Spirit is the person who "receives revelation and fears God" they believe that they were first regenerated in the New Testament system and then they are not the Holy Spirit.

3 0

3 years ago