The difference between the Trial courts and Appellate courts is that the Trial courts answer questions of fact, whereas the Appellate courts tend to answer questions of law.
Appellate Courts advocacy tends to sometimes looks cool, but not so, as it is one which has to envisage the intricacies of the proceedings which happened before the Trial courts and then, he or she can find out actual errors in the reasoning of the trial court.
The appellate courts tend to not retry the cases or hear any new evidence. As, here they are said to not hear any given witnesses testify. Thus, here there is no jury.
Hence, it is said that the Appellate courts tends to review the procedures and the decisions in the trial court.
To learn more about the Appellate Courts here:
brainly.com/question/29766399
#SPJ4
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
I believe that they should recive up to 5 years in prision or 5,000 dollar fine.
Answer:Capital punishment, if practiced widely enough, would help lower the overcrowded prison system. Also, the existence and use of capital punishment gives prosecutors a bargaining chip to use when plea bargaining with murders during trials, which speeds up the process and saves the court system money.
Explanation:
c. fair dept collection practices of 1978
Answer:
pocket picking
Explanation:
I think that is the answer