Answer:
D)the reader will not understand how ideas are connected
Explanation:
can you give me brainliest again :)
Based on the problem I have been asked I used "Why Investing in Fast Good May Be a Good Thing" by Amy Domini (1) and "Star Wars" by Roger Ebert (2).
1.) In her argument Amy Domini concludes we seek to invest in companies that are moving in the right direction and supports the conclusion with such evidence as how fast food is becoming more healthy and eco-friendly and how much fast food we as Americans eat on average. To link this conclusion with evidence she makes the assumption that many of us live more then 100 miles from a farm.
2.) Although what Roger Ebert says about Star Wars may be true in some cases, his position fails to take a non-visual sense for Star Wars into account. A closer look at non-visual effects in Star Wars reveals poor acting/scripting in some places and bad timing with sound effects.
3.)While the position advanced by X may seem reasonable, it assumes many of us live more than 100 miles from a farm. If that were true many of us would be out of jobs and there would be less produce on shelves. It might be more reasonable to consider that most small family/slow food restaurants just cannot keep up with the convenience of fast food.
4.)One way to look at fast food would be to say that it is as good as it's going to get; but if that were the case then the world wouldn't be facing so many health problems. Of course, another view might be that fast food is killing us. Yet another way to consider fast food might be that it is advancing and becoming better.
5.) Position slow food would be sound only if we chose to ignore the high prices and long waiting periods. When we consider the health benifits, then it becomes more appealing. In addition, you get to enjoy your food more and talk to your company.
6.)Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could all agree about Star Wars? The trouble is that different personalities like different movies. X says star wars is amazing while Y says it is the worst movie in history. How can we come to a compromise that recognizes Star Wars as a good movie with minor flaws.
We can see that the words Wislawa Szymborska uses to describe hatred are:
- master of contrast
- red blood and white snow
- vault, pounce and track, always ready and sluggish.
We can see that the factors Szymborska considers most important in keeping hate alive is:
- The perception of a disposition that is negative.
- Religion
- Nations.
<h3>Who is Wislawa Szymborska?</h3>
Wislawa Szymborska was known to be a Polish poet and essayist. She won the 1996 Nobel Prize in Literature. She was known for her poems which actually rivaled other authors.
We can actually see here that Szymborska talks about hatred and it's effect on mankind.
Learn more about Wislawa Szymborska on brainly.com/question/9192105
HUH? What's the question?