Answer: True.
Explanation:
It is considered a major or catastrophic incident to any incident caused in a natural or provoked way, which endangers the population, infrastructure, or natural resources.
When we talk about the <u>elements of the community</u>, we refer to government agencies, such as the police and firefighters. And non-governmental organizations such as churches, social organizations, or private individuals who can offer their help.
When an incident is considered catastrophic, the entire community's response is expected to help during or after the event. For example, when a hurricane strikes an area, the help is needed to evacuate the victims (firefighters and police). Also is required people who provide food to the victims (can help church members/social organizations), and reconstruction assistance (private company, people from the community).
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
At their beginning, the Arabs were an incredibly weak and loose collection of cities that could have easily been destroyed by Rome, yet the long peace with Rome led to prosperity, therefore B is the answer.
I believe the answer is: Public speaking
There are three major purpose for someone to conduct a public speaking. The first one is to inform the audience, the second purpose is to persuade the audiences to do something, and the third purpose public speaking is to entertain the audiences.
The Biopsychosocial model is especially relevant for the following types of sport situations:
- High intensity training
- Maximum effort
- Commitment to challenging goals
The Biopsychosocial model is a broad view that takes into consideration the variable interaction of biological factors, psychological factors and social factors.
Answer:
either-or fallacy
Explanation:
In the either or fallacy a situation is presented as the only alternative of another situation. But in fact there are other alternatives of a situation.
Here, according to Marty unless people get rid of guns they will have to face the same situation of gun violence that people faced in Kentucky, Arkansas, and Colorado. He has not considered what might happen if the guns are still present. There are countries where the existance of guns and violence is not related.
Hence, Marty is using the either-or fallacy.