Answer:
The statement is not reasonable.
Step-by-step explanation:
Josefina gave away 130% of her stamp collection.
We cannot give more than what we have.
lets understand it mathematically.
suppose i have x stamp.
according to question, i have to give 130% of my stamp collection
130% of x = 130/100 x = 1.3x
so, i have to given 1.3x stamp while i do have only x stamp which does not make any sense.
maximum i can give is x stamp.
x stamp in percentage of my total stamp collection which is also x will be
= x/x*100 = 100%
Thus, maximum one can give is 100% of what he has.
Thus, we can say that Josefina gave away 130% of her stamp collection is not reasonable.
Answer:
32
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
and as 
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
-- Missing from the question
Required
The behavior of the function around its vertical asymptote at 

Expand the numerator

Factorize

Factor out x + 1

We test the function using values close to -2 (one value will be less than -2 while the other will be greater than -2)
We are only interested in the sign of the result
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As x approaches -2 implies that:
Say x = -3


We have a negative value (-12); This will be called negative infinity
This implies that as x approaches -2, p(x) approaches negative infinity

Take note of the superscript of 2 (this implies that, we approach 2 from a value less than 2)
As x leaves -2 implies that: 
Say x = -2.1

We have a negative value (-56.1); This will be called negative infinity
This implies that as x leaves -2, p(x) approaches negative infinity

So, the behavior is:
and as 
You could factor a 7 out of 7 + 14 to get 7(1 + 2).
This would equal the same thing as 7 + 14, which is 21.
7 * 3 = 21.
21 can be factored like so:
1 * 21 = 21
3 * 7 = 21
There is NO solution.
Cancel t on both sides (1/5 = 7/8).
Since 1/5 = 7/8, that doesn't make any sense so that is inapplicable ( So NO answer).