Question

For class discussion this module, please analyze the following short fact patterns with an eye toward deciding whether strict liability or negligence (1) should apply and (2) does apply as a matter of law:
1 - John is playing with his pet dog in his front yard. The dog sees a child across the street and, without warning, runs toward the child and knocks her over, causing various bruises.

2 - John's pet alligator escapes from his backyard and bites his neighbor.

3 - A high-tech manufacturing corporation is testing a new technology for using microwaves to improve data density on hard drives, and their experiment causes a metal shard to fly out of their window and hit a passerby across the street, 700 feet away. There was no specific reason the company should have expected this to happen.

Answer 1

In the first case with john, it is the case of negligence  and as such, negligence lawsuit should be applied.

• In the case of John's pet alligator, one can say that it is  strict liability lawsuit as it was not intentional.

• In the case of the company, it is the case of negligence  and as such, negligence lawsuit should be applied.

What is the lawsuit about?

In a negligence lawsuit, the plaintiff is said to argue against the defendant's negligence or recklessness that has led to their injuries.

In a strict liability lawsuit, the defendant is known to be liable for damages even though he or she was said to not be negligent or at fault.

Learn more about negligence lawsuit from

brainly.com/question/14480857

#SPJ1