Answer:
A. Nikolai's dual character
Explanation:
Forking rivers or paths are commonly used to express a character's opposing features in literature. In this case, it represents Nikolai's two sides - stern and caring. The river merges into one at the end - implying that his two sides can coexist.
Cesar Chavez would probably agree that people should act with cooperation and compassion for one another, as shown in option C. The sentence that follows this is:
"I am giving you the same opportunity to join the same cause, to free your fellow human beings from the yoke of oppression."
<h3>Why does Chaves believe that people should act with cooperation and compassion?</h3>
- According to Chaves, changes only occur with social cooperation.
- He believes that social groups marginalized by the government such as blacks, workers, women, among others, must come together to bring about the change they need.
- However, this union will only occur if people do not act thinking only about themselves, but thinking about everyone who has suffered socially and needs help to prosper in life.
In this way, Chaves shows how King was an example of cooperation and compassion and that's why his words are inspiring.
More information about Martin Luther King at the link:
brainly.com/question/3832772
Answer: we are counting on the cashier and the security at the door
Explanation:
Teh cashier is mentioned which means she was paying there for her items and we see the cashier putting her grocery on the plastic bags which is only usual done after the customer has paid .Jackie was also able to leave the store we can assume that at the door she passed through the security who checked her grocery to ensure it was paid for and then she was allowed to leave the store freely.
What is the poem?
If you can tell me what its called I cannhelp.
Here is the full excerpt for this question:
For me, reading has always been a path toward liberation and fulfilment. To learn to read is to start down the road of liberation, a road which should be accessible to everyone. No one has the right to keep you from reading, and yet that is what is happening in many areas in this country today. There are those who think they know best what we should read. These censors are at work in all areas of our daily lives.
I believe the answer is: D. emotions
Rhetoric that appeal to emotions could be seen from the use of sentences that is aimed to make the readers/listeners relate to a certain situation that might ignite their emotional response. From the excerpt above, this could be seen in this line: <em>No one has the right to keep you from reading, and yet that is what is happening in many areas in this country today.</em>
