The three evidence that support the existence of plants on Antarctica are:
- Climate;
- Pollen;
- Herbivorous animals;
Apart from the plant fossils found on Antarctica, there are few other evidence that suggest that plants existed in the past on the now frozen continent. Some of those evidence for the existence of plants on Antarctica are the pollen found in the rocks and fossils of organisms, the climate records, as well as the herbivorous animals.
The pollen is only released by the plants, thus that is a sure indicator that plants were occupying this part of the world.
The climate records on Antarctica that can be seen in the rock layers, suggest that for most of its existence, Antarctica had a warm and wet climate, which is perfect conditions for the plants to thrive.
The herbivorous animals are feeding themselves on plant material, so since there's fossils of herbivores in Antarctica, it for sure is an evidence that there were plants existing in order for them to feed and be able to live in there.
<span>Compact bone is the external or outer layer of a bone that gives bone tissue a "hard-like" feel, while a spongy bone is the inner bone. Spongy bone is porous and sits underneath the compact bone. If spongy bone does not receive ample calcium nutrients, it is most vulnerable to breakage.
</span>
The answer I believe is- Dominant Gene
This was to gain more support for Allied efforts in the
Second World War to ensure their victory.
By utilizing media, propaganda to support the war went into full swing
as companies lent their efforts to achieve that end. They convinced people to buy war bonds as
well as boost morale for the troops.
