Answer:
A. Species that remained after the extinction were able to radiate, new adaptations arose, and these adaptations produced the diversity seen today.
Explanation:
When species went extinct they also left niches that could be occupied by "new" species; new places to live, places to be filled in the food web and different relationships to be formed. The wide availability of resources made organisms to radiate leading to a "new" diversity of shapes, sizes, and lifestyles.
B. Species that have gone extinct were able to re-evolve from the ancestors that survived the extinction. If you are extinct you are gone forever.
C. Species that remained after the extinction were unable to speciate. Therefore, the number of species on Earth today is lower than the number of species present just before either extinction. The fossil record proves that species have changed over time and the diversity has changed over the history of Earth.
D. Species that remained after the extinction represented all of the lineages that were present before the extinction event. Therefore, extinction did not change the diversity of lineages. Again, the fossil record is evidence that lineages have changed over the history of the Earth.
here is the answer
Starches include grain products, such as bread, crackers, pasta, and rice. As with simple sugars, some complex carbohydrate foods are better choices than others. Refined grains, such as white flour and white rice, have been processed, which removes nutrients and fiber.
Answer b (probably wrong)
Answer:
Plant breeding is actually BOTH art and science.
Explanation:
Plant breeding is the changing of the traits for different plants and/or characteristics, and it helps improve the nutrients of the plant.
Hope this helped :)
Brainiest?
The answer is the first choice
