You have to find the slope of the line. It will give you the conversion rate from inches to centimetres or the other way around.
Looking closely at the graph, or using a ruler as reference, you can estimate that 30 cm ≈ 12 in. In terms of the graph, the line very nearly passes through the point (12, 30). It also passes through the origin, (0, 0), since 0 cm = 0 in exactly.
The slope of the line is then
which means that 1 in ≈ 2.5 cm.
So, if Sarah's height is 64 in, we convert this to cm and find her height is (approximately)
Finding 4 x 384 helps you find 4 x 5384 because once you have the answer to 4 x 384, you can then just add the answer to 4 x 5000 to the answer of 4 x 384.
4 x 384 = 1,536
4 x 5000 = 20,000
20,000 + 1,536 = 21,536
Answer:
irrational.
Step-by-step explanation:
0.7777... repeats and does not end so it is irrational
Answer: You divide the top row by itself and you multiply the top by 2 each time.
Step-by-step explanation: Multiply 72 by 2 each time on top and the bottom row just simply add 1.
Sorry if it is wrong but i hope it helps!
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a reflection. A reflection is a transformation involving two shapes looking the same by "bouncing it off a line without coming back.( meaning a reflection goes some where else not to it original poistion.)
Others reason why Why?
Line m is perpendicular to Line c.
B and E are equidistant from c that BC=CE.
Why the others are wrong.
While you could rotate this triangle 180 degrees, the transformation occurs about a line not a point. So using a rotation is wrong.
A translation doesnt occur about a line.
A guide reflection doesnt work since the transformations are already mapped correctly if you do the reflection. It doesnt need a translation.
